Jayaram vs M. Papaiah Reddy on 20 November, 2025
NC: 2025:KHC:48267
WP No. 47994 of 2019
HC-KAR
property in lieu of the maintenance amount awarded to her
under Section 125 Cr.PC, and therefore, I do not find any merit
in the contention urged on behalf of her, that her right in the
share of defendant no.2 - Nagappa Reddy had enlarged to an
absolute right in view of Section 14(1) of the Act. Since the
case of respondent no.2 is not covered under the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sadhu Singh's case,
Tulasamma's case and Munni Devi's case supra, the order
passed in Tej Bhan's case referring the question of right of a
Hindu female under Section 14 of the Act to a larger Bench is of
no consequence to the present case.