Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (4.56 seconds)
Documents citing Pidilite Industries Limited vs Poma-Ex Products And 15 Ors on 2 August, 2017

Pidilite Industries Limited vs Riya Chemy on 11 November, 2022

40. Mr. Ramakrishnan has distinguished the decision in the case of Pidilite Industries Limited Vs. Poma Ex-Products case (supra) relied upon by the plaintiff. In that case, the judgment makes the argument acknowledging that two registrations there is a disclaimer regarding the use of the word 'kwik' whereas the same is not the case in two others. The Plaintiff therein had admitted that the disclaimers play a vital role and the words that are disclaimed are generic in nature. The Judge in that case had agreed to this line of argument. The samples of fewikwik and kwikheal in that case reveal that the exact same colours and presentation of the colours were used by the infringing mark and it was on this basis that the Court held in favour of fevikwik. Moreover, after interim order was granted, kwikheal secured trademark registration. The facts of the present case are entirely different since the registration precedes the assignment of trademark itself.
Bombay High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

M/S Harsh Automobiles Private Limited ... vs Indore Municipal Corporation on 24 October, 2017

The State of Madhya Pradesh & others), (17) Writ Petition No.6207/2012 (M/s. Pidilite Industries Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others), (18) Writ Petition No.4592/2013 (Tata Teleservices Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others), (19) Writ Petition No.8170/2012 (Total Oil India Private Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others), (20) Contempt Case No.463/2014 (Idea Cellular Limited v. Mr. Rakesh Singh & another), (21) Writ Petition No.4770/2014 (Signature Laminates Private Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others), (22) Writ Petition No.6099/2014 (Nokia India Sales Private Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others) and (23) Writ Petition No.6344/2014 (Value Industries Limited v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 81 - Cited by 1 - A Verma - Full Document

Ganraj Enterprises vs Land Mark Crafts Pvt. Ltd & Anr on 2 December, 2025

[Emphasis Supplied] 11.3.3. The Respondent No. 2 in the impugned order, has relied upon the judgment(s) passed by the High Court of Bombay in Skol Breweries Signature Not Verified C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 164/2022 Signed By:MAHIMA Page 13 of 18 SHARMA Signing Date:02.12.2025 18:33:53 Ltd. v. Som Distilleries & Breweries Ltd.5 and Pidilite Industries Limited v. Poma-Ex Products6, wherein as well it has been similarly held that condition and limitation placed in respect of one TM registration cannot be read into a separate and distinct TM registration although of the same trademark.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M P Arora - Full Document
1