Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Md. Hafij & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 11 April, 2016

The State Of Jharkhand Through The ... vs Nawal Kishore on 14 November, 2019

In that view of the matter, we are of the considered view that the Hon'ble Single Judge has rightly relied upon the decisions in Ranjit Sahay Jamuar's case and Md. Hafiz's case (supra), for holding that in the facts of this case, the respondent writ petitioners were also entitled to get the financial benefits with retrospective effect from which they were promoted to the post.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H C Mishra - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Jha vs The State Of Jharkhand on 15 January, 2020

10. The respondents - State, in the capacity of a model employer, cannot be permitted to raise an arguments that even if petitioner is granted promotion with retrospective effect, he is not eligible for financial and consequential benefits. The Judgments referred to above clearly speaks in volume that in such cases the concerned employee is entitled for all consequential benefits. Accordingly, it is held that petitioner is also entitled for the benefits retrospectively.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S N Pathak - Full Document

The State Of Bihar Through The Principal ... vs Dhannoo Lal on 22 February, 2017

State has come forward with a fact that monetary benefit granted to the junior along with promotion is completely illegal, show cause for illegal act has been handed over to the authorities who have been found involved are also facing the departmental proceeding. He has prayed for review of the order but he has not pointed out any Patna High Court C. REV. No.209 of 2015 (9) dt.22-02-2017 2 error apparent on the face of the record. So much so this issue granting monetary benefit from the date of promotion is no longer res integra in view of the several judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as this Court. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgments of this Court in the case of Shiva Narayan Lal v. State of Bihar and others, reported in 1999(1) PLJR 243 and Md. Hafiz v. State of Bihar and others, reported in 2003(2 PLJR 44. Both the judgments reflect, the person who has not been granted promotion, illegally deprived from promotion is entitled the benefit of promotion, from retrospective effect along with financial benefit.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Pandey - Full Document
1