Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)
Documents citing Sadhuram Shukla vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 August, 2018

Nasiruddin vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 September, 2023

4. It is the contention of the writ petitioner that the policy dated 07.10.2016 is Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUSHEEL KUMAR JHARIYA Signing time: 9/22/2023 11:36:44 AM 3 applicable to the case of the petitioner and the petitioner deserves a permanent status as he was working since long in the respondent/department. Placing reliance upon a judgment passed by this Court in the case of Sadhuram Shukla vs. State of M.P. and others (W.P.No.3047 of 2012 decided on 16.08.2018), the petitioner prayed for the similar relief as granted therein. The writ court has failed to consider the aforesaid aspect of the matter and has dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner was never appointed under the Government service. He was never paid salary through the Government head. The salary was paid to the petitioner by Pashu Kalyan Samiti. From the documents which have been filed by the petitioner, it cannot be said that the petitioner was in continuous employment even in the Pashu Kalyan Samiti. He was engaged from time to time on requirement basis. There is no document available on record to show that the petitioner was ever appointed by the order of the Collector. Therefore, no relief can be extended to the petitioner and the writ petition was dismissed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Malimath - Full Document
1