Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing Ram Chander Son Of Prabhu Dayal And ... vs State Of Haryana on 2 September, 2009

Subhash Sharma & Anr vs Rekha Rani Alias Nibha Rani & Anr on 22 January, 2014

In support of his above contentions, he placed reliance on Pandurang Sitaram Bhagwat vs. State of Maharashtra, 2005(1)RCR (Criminal) 858; Rai Sandeep @ Deepu vs. State of NCT of Delhi, 2012(4) RCR(Crimiinal) 11, Mayawati vs. Hukam Chand Attreja, 2002(2)RCR (Criminal) 142, Surjan and others vs. State of M.P., (2002)10 Supreme Court Cases 214, Ved Parkash vs. State of Haryana, AIR 1981 Supreme Court 643, Arvind Mohan Sinha vs. Amulya Kumar Biswas and Others, (1974) 4 Supreme Court Cases 222; Kawar Pal Singh Gill vs. State, 2005 (3) RCR(Criminal) 772; and Prabhu Dayal vs. State of Haryana, 1999(1) RCR(Criminal) 428.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - N K Sanghi - Full Document

Subhash Sharma & Anr vs Rekha Rani Alias Nibha Rani & Anr on 7 February, 2014

In support of his above contentions, he placed reliance on Pandurang Sitaram Bhagwat vs. State of Maharashtra, 2005(1)RCR (Criminal) 858; Rai Sandeep @ Deepu vs. State of NCT of Delhi, 2012(4) RCR(Crimiinal) 11, Mayawati vs. Hukam Chand Attreja, 2002(2)RCR (Criminal) 142, Surjan and others vs. State of M.P., (2002)10 Supreme Court Cases 214, Ved Parkash vs. State of Haryana, AIR 1981 Supreme Court 643, Arvind Mohan Sinha vs. Amulya Kumar Biswas and Others, (1974) 4 Supreme Court Cases 222; Kawar Pal Singh Gill vs. State, 2005 (3) RCR(Criminal) 772; and Prabhu Dayal vs. State of Haryana, 1999(1) RCR(Criminal) 428.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - N K Sanghi - Full Document

Bhupinder Singh vs Gram Panchayat on 16 January, 2014

There is no dispute regarding the proposition of law laid down in Bashember Dayal (supra). However, the same is found to be distinguishable on the facts and circumstances of the present case. The said case law is applicable to the property which is 'shamilat deh' as per the provisions of Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules (1964). In that case, the passage allegedly to be used was within the abadi deh and other passage was also in existence.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - P Singh - Full Document
1