Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 480 (0.71 seconds)
Documents citing R.P. Kapur vs Union Of India And Anr on 19 November, 1963

Uco Bank Zonal Office Hazratganj ... vs Harihar Prasad Pandey on 29 March, 2019

In R.P. Kapur v. Union of India [(1964) 5 SCR 431 : AIR 1964 SC 787] a Constitution Bench of this Court observed: (SCR p. 444) "If the trial of the criminal charge results in conviction, disciplinary proceedings are bound to follow against the public servant so convicted. Even in case of acquittal proceedings may follow, where the acquittal is other than honourable."
Allahabad High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - S Hasnain - Full Document

The Superintending Engineer vs Mohan Kumar

The judgment in the case of R.P.Kapur (supra) was not cited in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary (supra) despite being a Larger Bench judgment and, thus, was distinguished by the Division Bench of this court in A.Srinivasan (supra) on facts as well as on legal position after discussing the judgment in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary ____________ Page 25 of 38 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A (MD).No.1827 of 2021 (supra).
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

The Superintending Engineer vs Mohan Kumar

The judgment in the case of R.P.Kapur (supra) was not cited in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary (supra) despite being a Larger Bench judgment and, thus, was distinguished by the Division Bench of this court in A.Srinivasan (supra) on facts as well as on legal position after discussing the judgment in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary ____________ Page 25 of 38 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A (MD).No.1827 of 2021 (supra).
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M N Bhandari - Full Document

T.Narasimha Das vs The Ap. Dairy Development Cooperative ... on 6 April, 2022

Position of law where suspension is authorised under terms of service may be stated thus. Where there is power conferred on the employer to suspend an employee, whether under express form in the contract or under the rules governing the terms and conditions of service, the order of suspension has the effect of temporarily suspending the relation of master and servant, without terminating it, with the consequence that employee is not bound to render the service and the employer is not bound to pay. In such a case employee is not entitled to receive any payment at all from the employer, unless terms of condition envisages some payment as subsistence allowance. This principle was enunciated in Management of Imperial Hotel, New Delhi Vs. Hotel Workers Union, and in R.P. Kapur Vs. U.O.I. & Anr., and V.P. Gindroniya Vs. State of M.P. (10).
Telangana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P M Devi - Full Document

Hiteshkumar Jashwantsinh Taparia ... vs Municipal Commissioner on 26 June, 2015

31. The Apex Court in the case of R.P. Kapur v.  Union   of   India   and   another,   1964   AIR   (SC)   787,  has held that the employer would have a right to  suspend a public servant in one or two ways. It  may   suspend   any   public   servant   pending  departmental   enquiry   or   pending   criminal  proceedings or the Government may also proceed to  hold   departmental   enquiry   and   after   his   being  found guilty, order of suspension as a punishment  can   be   passed   if   the   rules   so   permit.   In   other  words,   the   authority   which   appoints   a   public  servant would be entitled to suspend him pending  Page 13 of 22 C/SCA/9185/2015 CAV JUDGMENT a   departmental   enquiry   into   his   conduct   or  pending   a   criminal   proceeding,   which   may  eventually   result   in   a   departmental   enquiry  against   him.   Article   311   and   314   pf   the  Constitution   of   India   have   been   enumerated   to  hold   that   the   employer   would   have   a   right   to  suspend   an   employee   in   any   of   the   two   ways  mentioned hereinabove.
Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next