Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.80 seconds)
Documents citing Canara Bank vs T.T.Ltd. on 30 September, 2014

K S Bhandari vs M/S. International Security Printers ... on 16 May, 2025

77. The above paragraph read with the extracted portion of Madan Mohan Lal (supra) would show there is in fact no inconsistency or contradiction in O.REF. 1/2025 & connected Page 54 of 58 Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAHUL Signing Date:16.05.2025 19:12:50 the line of judgments, starting from, Chuni Lal (supra), Madan Mohan Lal (supra) and leading up to Canara Bank (Supra). The consistent view has been that Section 14 and Section 22 of the DRC, 1958 are available to non- natural persons.
Delhi High Court Cites 57 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

M/S International Security Printers ... vs Mr. K.S. Bhandari on 30 September, 2015

On behalf of petitioner, reliance is placed upon the case laws titled as Rajender Kumar Sharma & Ors Vs. Leela Wati & Ors 155 (2008) DLT 383, Rishal Singh Vs. Bohat Ram & Ors 2014 (144) DRJ 633, Mohd. Ayub & Anr Vs. Mukesh Chand (2012) 2SCC 155, R.C Tamrakar & Anr. E. No. 493/14/12 Page No. 11/21 Vs. Nidhi Lekha (2001) 8SCC 431, Siddaalingamma & Anr. Vs. Mamtha Shenoy (2001) 8SCC 561, Sarla Ahuja Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. (1998) 8SCC 119,Canara Bank Vs. T.T. Ltd. 214 (2014) DLT 526.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Frontier Sales on 29 November, 2016

It is contended by the petitioner that for a Company, its employees are its family members, without whom, there cannot be the existence of the Company. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the famous judgment Canara Bank V/S T.T. Ltd. 2014 (214) DLT 526 wherein it is held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that the provisions of Sec. 22 of the DRC Act is in addition to provision of Sec. 14 (1) E­47/16 Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs Frontier Sales Page no.12/17
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Frontier Sales on 29 November, 2016

It is contended by the petitioner that for a Company, its employees are its family members, without whom, there cannot be the existence of the Company. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the famous judgment Canara Bank V/S T.T. Ltd. 2014 (214) DLT 526 wherein it is held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that the provisions of Sec. 22 of the DRC Act is in addition to provision of Sec. 14 (1) E­50/16 Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs Frontier Sales Page no.12/17
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Frontier Sales on 29 November, 2016

It is contended by the petitioner that for a Company, its employees are its family members, without whom, there cannot be the existence of the Company. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the famous judgment Canara Bank V/S T.T. Ltd. 2014 (214) DLT 526 wherein it is held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that the provisions of Sec. 22 of the DRC Act is in addition to provision of Sec. 14 (1) E­49/16 Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs Frontier Sales Page no.12/17
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Frontier Sales on 29 November, 2016

It is contended by the petitioner that for a Company, its employees are its family members, without whom, there cannot be the existence of the Company. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner also relied upon the famous judgment Canara Bank V/S T.T. Ltd. 2014 (214) DLT 526 wherein it is held by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi that the provisions of Sec. 22 of the DRC Act is in addition to provision of Sec. 14 (1) E­51/16 Superior Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs Frontier Sales Page no.12/17
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next