Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Liyakat Ali @ Lala vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 October, 2011

K.Munir vs State Of M.P. on 23 February, 2017

He also placed reliance on this Court's judgment passed in the case of Liyaqat Ali Vs. State of M.P., reported in 2009(1) EFR 114. but that citation does not give any assistance to the appellant because in that case it is clear from para 6 to 16 of the statement of Shivdayal (PW-5) that at the time of his statement prosecution produced article A1 and A2 sample of seized opium and Court also examined the sealed packets and accused also in cross-examination in this regard to the said witness.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arjun Singh vs The State Of M.P. on 26 May, 2017

He also placed reliance on apex court judgment passed in Noor Aga Vs state of Cr.A.No.1042/2002 Punjab and others, reported in (2008) 16 scc 417 and this Court's judgment passed in the case of Liyaqat Ali Vs. State of M.P., reported in 2009(1) EFR 114. but these judgements do not give any assistance to the appellant because in this case it is clear from para 16 of the statement of P.C.Chasta (PW-3) that at the time of his statement prosecution produced article A1 and A2 sample of seized opium and Court also examined the sealed packets and from Ex.P/37, it is also proved that remaining material was disposed of after taking photos of material by order of JMFC, Jawad according to provisions of section 52A of the act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shriram vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 January, 2020

5. Learned public prosecutor has submitted that the photographs produced by the police with the charge sheet, in which weighing machine showing weight of the bag 50 kgs is not weight of 4 bags recovered from the prosecution. When compared with the other bags, which were actually recovered from the petitioners, the bags kept on weighing machine showing 50 kgs weight is clearly a different bag. Roz Namcha dated 02.06.2019 in which proceedings of weighing the contraband is recorded shows that the contraband was first taken out from the bag originally recovered from the petitioners. It was made homogeneous and thereafter kept in the bag and weighted. Therefore, it cannot be said that the HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH; BENCH AT INDORE MCRC No.52917/2019 and 52232/2019 Shri Ram and Liyakat Ali Vs. State of MP weight of recovered contraband was 50 kgs. The documents prepared on the spot or at the police station sufficiently shows recovery of commercial quantity of contraband from the possession of the petitioners, therefore, they are not entitled for bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Singh - Full Document
1