Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing Dlvisional Personnel Officer, Western ... vs Sundar Dass on 16 October, 1981

Nelson Motis vs Union Of India And Another on 2 September, 1992

13. The case of Divisional Personnel Officer, Western Railway, Kota v. Sunder Dass , is again of no help. The facts stated in the judgment leave no room for doubt that the question which has been agitated before us did not arise for consideration there, as the Government servant was actually under suspension earlier. Interpreting the relevant rules of Indian Railway Establishment Code the Supreme Court agreed with the Department and allowed the appeal against the Government servant.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 332 - L M Sharma - Full Document

Sudhanshu Vachaspati Tripathi vs Union Of India And Others on 30 May, 2019

25. Thus, the finding recorded by the Tribunal that the period from 15.4.1984 to 25.05.2007, treating it as dies non (non duty) is against the Rules 1968 and the law laid down by the Apex Court, as it is not in dispute that once the removal order was set aside by the Tribunal, which was upheld by this Court, the petitioner was reinstated in service on 23.07.2007 and, thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority by order dated 30.05.2008 modified the earlier punishment order and petitioner was placed at the lowest pay scale for three years with cumulative effect, which was further modified on 22.01.2009 and punishment order from 3 years to 1 year with cumulative effect with all consequential benefits was passed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Sri Prasidh Narayan Srivastava vs Union Of India Through General Manager on 27 September, 2011

4. Relying upon decision of Honble Supreme Court in the case of Divisional, Personnel Officer, Western Railway, Kota Vs. Sunder Dass, Mr. Dave, learned counsel for the respondent further submits that where a penalty of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement from service imposed upon a railway servant is rendered void in consequence of the decision of a court of law and the disciplinary authority, on consideration of the circumstances of the case, decides to hold a further inquiry against him on the allegations on which the penalty of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement was imposed, the railway servant shall be deemed to have been placed under suspension by the competent authority, para 8 of the judgment read as under :-
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.Prasanna Kumar vs Union Of India Represented By The ... on 14 December, 2009

"The case of Divisional Personnel Officer, Western Railway, Kota Vs. Sunder Dass (AIR 1981 SC 2177) is again of no help. The facts stated in the judgment leave no room for doubt that the question which has been agitated before us did not arise for consideration there, as the Government servant was actually under suspension. Interpreting the relevant rules of Indian Railway Establishment Code the Supreme Court agreed with the department and allowed the appeal."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lal Bahadur Shastri Edu. Soci.Jodhpur vs Raj. Non- Govt. Edu. Insti. Tri.& Ors on 6 January, 2011

In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention towards judgments reported in JT 1996 (5) SC 403, State of Punjab & Others Vs. Dr. Harbhajan Singh Greasy, (1981) 4 SCC 563, Divisional Personnel Officer, Wester Railway, Kota Vs. Sunder Dass; and, AIR 1981 SC 1400, Rafiq & Another Vs. Munshilal & Another.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - G K Vyas - Full Document
1   2 Next