Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.26 seconds)
Documents citing Hari Narayan Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 November, 2014

Molai Ram Verma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 July, 2017

In the circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation raising all their grievance before the respondents/concerned authority within a period of two weeks from today and the respondents/concerned authority shall decide the same in accordance with law within a further period of three months from the date of its filing in the light of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 09.12.2011 in the matter of Hari Narayan Sharma vs. State of M.P. passed in W.P. No.2726/2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devendra Pratap Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 November, 2019

On earlier occasion, in pursuance to the order passed by this Court, the Department has considered the claim of the petitioner and rejected the same vide order dated 28.07.2017, whereby the respondent has come with a specific stand that the daily wager is not entitled to get any benefit of pension after his superannuation. The Authority has also taken note of the law laid down in case of Hari Narayan Sharma (supra), on which the petitioner has placed reliance.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Gulab vs Public Works Department on 14 June, 2016

She further submits that relying on the said judgment, this Court has already disposed of W.P. No.2726/2011 vide order dated 09/12/2011 in the matter of Hari Narayan Sharma Vs. State of M.P. & Ors. She 2 further submits that as the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by judgment passed in the matter of Mohammad Sadiq (Supra) therefore the respondents be directed to examine the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed in Mohammad Sadiq (Supra).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Poonam Bai vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 March, 2016

When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 9.12.2011 in the matter of Hari Narayan Sharma vs. State of M.P passed in W.P.No.2726/2011, the petitioner is entitled for pension. She has prayed for a direction to decide the petitioner's pending representation considering the judgment of the Division Bench.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devendra Pratap Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 March, 2017

When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the light of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court dated 09.12.2011 in the matter of Hari Narayan Sharma vs. State of M.P. passed in W.P. No.2726/2011, the petitioner is entitled for pension. Learned counsel for the petitioners prayed for a direction to decide the petitioners’ pending representation considering the judgment of the Division Bench.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1