Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.55 seconds)
Documents citing Gopal & Ors. For Vacation Of Stay Dated ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 22 June, 2020

Amarjeet Singh Chawla And Anr vs Union Of India And Anr on 7 July, 2022

807/2019 VIRENDER JEET & ANR INDERMOHAN NOT 511 01.11.2016 TO MARWAHA -1478413 APPLICABLE VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 31.10.2021 807/2019 VIRENDER JEET & ANR VIRENDER JEET- 01.11.2016 TO NOT VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 1487972 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 808/2019 MR. RAM SINGH AND NOT 512 ANR. RAM SINGH -1255950 01.11.2016 TO APPLICABLE VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 31.10.2021 808/2019 MR. RAM SINGH AND NOT ANR. DAYA KISHAN-1255977 01.11.2016 TO APPLICABLE VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 31.10.2021 817/2019 DINESH KUMAR MANJU AGGARWAL - NOT 513 AGGARWAL & ANR VS. UNION OF 01.11.2016 TO 1924070 APPLICABLE INDIA & ANR 31.10.2021 817/2019 DINESH KUMAR DINESH AGGARWAL- NOT AGGARWAL & ANR VS. UNION OF 01.11.2016 TO 709824 APPLICABLE INDIA & ANR 31.10.2021 820/2019 RISHI NAGAR VS. UNION 01.11.2016 TO NOT 514 RISHI NAGAR -2791218 OF INDIA & ANR 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Page 120 of 327 Signing Date:11.07.2022 13:53:43 821/2019 SUDERSHAN SINGH SANADIIP GADH - NOT 515 WAZIR & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA 01.11.2016 TO 1086061 APPLICABLE & ANR 31.10.2021 821/2019 SUDERSHAN SINGH SUDERSHAN WAZIR- NOT WAZIR & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA 01.11.2016 TO 2261173 APPLICABLE & ANR 31.10.2021 823/2019 NEELAM SHARMA VS. NEELAM SHARMA - 01.11.2016 TO NOT 516 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 2652770 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 825/2019 NISHANT KUMAR VS. NISHANT KUMAR - 01.11.2016 TO NOT 517 UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2505151 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 826/2019 SAHIL GULATI & ANR VS. 01.11.2016 TO NOT 518 SAHIL GULATI -1404714 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 826/2019 SAHIL GULATI & ANR VS. SUMALEE MADAN- 01.11.2016 TO NOT UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 3175556 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 872/2019 PAWAN KUMAR BATRA & PAWAN BATRA - 01.11.2016 TO NOT 519 ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 1951151 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 874/2019 NIDESH GUPTA & ANR VS. 01.11.2016 TO NOT 520 NIDESH GUPTA-309375 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 874/2019 NIDESH GUPTA & ANR VS. RAKESH GUPTA - 01.11.2016 TO NOT UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2309685 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 875/2019 KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR 01.11.2016 TO NOT 521 SUNANDA-1028518 & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 875/2019 KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR 01.11.2016 TO NOT KEWAL KUMAR-42504 & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 875/2019 KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR 01.11.2016 TO NOT TARUN KUMAR-42515 & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 875/2019 KEWAL KRISHAN KUMAR SIDDHARTH KUMAR- 01.11.2016 TO NOT & ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 42518 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 880/2019 SANJAY SURJE VS. UNION 01.11.2016 TO NOT 522 SANJAY SURJ-3451945 OF INDIA & ANR. 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 888/2019 MUKUL AGGARWAL & MUKUL AGGARWAL- 01.11.2016 TO NOT 523 ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 828866 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 908/2019 MAHESGWARI SINGH & MAHESHWARI SINGH - 01.11.2016 TO NOT 524 ANR. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 1086527 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 908/2019 MAHESGWARI SINGH & SUKHDEEP SINGH- 01.11.2016 TO NOT ANR. VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 1140718 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 924/2019 VIVEK CHOUDHRY & ANR. VIVEK CHOUDHRY - 01.11.2016 TO NOT 525 VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 422369 31.10.2021 APPLICABLE 924/2019 VIVEK CHOUDHRY & ANR.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 370 - Cited by 40 - Manmohan - Full Document

Page No.# 1/44 vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 27 February, 2025

11. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions urged before this Court and also having perusal of the judgment and order dated 27.07.2020 rendered by the Delhi High Court in Tarun Kumar Banjaree vs. Union of India reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Del 859 as well as the OM dated 14.12.2010 as well as 25.05.2018 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Department of Personnel & Training Cadre Review Division, it is clear that the petitioners claim for Cadre Review is not misplaced. The Department is required to process the proposal for Cadre Review for Group 'A' Officers of Assam Rifles. In terms of the instructions, the proposal has now under the active consideration by the Ministry of Home Affairs, this Court is of the view that these writ petitions can be disposed of directing the respondent Authorities to complete the process of Cadre Review within a period of 10 (ten) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.
Gauhati High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Saikia - Full Document

Page No.# 1/44 vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 27 February, 2025

11. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions urged before this Court and also having perusal of the judgment and order dated 27.07.2020 rendered by the Delhi High Court in Tarun Kumar Banjaree vs. Union of India reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Del 859 as well as the OM dated 14.12.2010 as well as 25.05.2018 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Department of Personnel & Training Cadre Review Division, it is clear that the petitioners claim for Cadre Review is not misplaced. The Department is required to process the proposal for Cadre Review for Group 'A' Officers of Assam Rifles. In terms of the instructions, the proposal has now under the active consideration by the Ministry of Home Affairs, this Court is of the view that these writ petitions can be disposed of directing the respondent Authorities to complete the process of Cadre Review within a period of 10 (ten) months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.
Gauhati High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Saikia - Full Document

Sh Neeraj Kumar And Others vs Union Of India & Ors. on 18 August, 2020

8. Attention of the counsel for the petitioners has been drawn to our judgment in Tarun Kumar Banjaree Vs. Union of India 2020 SCC OnLine Del 859 where, while declining the reliefs claimed by members of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) as a consequence of being declared OGAS, we have directed the Central Government to consider the representations preferred by them.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1