Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.46 seconds)

Cr No, 1415/2022 State vs . Pramod Kumar @ Rinku on 29 March, 2023

26. Though the accused choose not to lead Defence Evidence, accused has sufficiently discharged that onus of proof upon him by highlighting improbabilities and serious countradictions in the Ce Br "& CR No. 1415/2022 State Vs. Pramod Kumar @ Rinku evidence led by the prosecution. The accused has created sufficient doubt in the mind of the court about correctness of the prosecution version and hte benefit of doubt deserves to be given to the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hori Lal vs State Of U.P. And Another on 6 May, 2025

6. After submission of aforesaid charge sheet/police report cognizance was taken upon same by the jurisdictional Magistrate in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. vide Cognizance Taking Order dated 30.04.2024. Since offence complained of is triable exclusively by the Court of Sessions, accordingly, concerned Magistrate committed the case to Court of Sessions vide committal order dated 03.05.2024. Resultantly, Sessions Trial no. 1161 of 2024 (State Vs. Rinku Kumar) arising out of Case Crime No. 34 of 2024 under section 363,302, 201 I.P.C. P.S. Ghoorpur, District Allahabad came to be registered.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Rinku Kumar @ Rinku vs State Of U.P. And Another on 19 September, 2023

2. Applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the entire proceeding in Case No. 42 of 2023 (State of U.P. Vs. Rinku Kumar) arising out of Case Crime No. 259 of 2022, under Section 354-(Ga), 506 I.P.C. & 67(A) of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, Police Station- Gaunda, District- Aligarh as well as charge sheet dated 05.11.2022 along with conginzance order dated 11.01.2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Iglas Aligarh.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - D Pathak - Full Document

Devendra Shukla @ Mantu And Anr. vs State Of U.P. on 20 December, 2024

1. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.12.2018, passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, E.C. Act, Pilibhit in Sessions Trial No.199 of 2015 (State Vs. Devendra Shukla @ Mantu & Ors.), under Sections 148, 452, 302/149, 323/149, 504, 506 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.529 of 2015, Police Station - Sungarhi, District - Pilibhit; Sessions Trial Nos.200 of 2015 (State Vs. Rahul Shukla Alias Rinku), 201 of 2015 (State Vs. Devendra Shukla @ Mantu), 202 of 2015 (State Vs. Mahesh Shukla), under Section 4/25 Arms Act, arising out of Case Crime Nos.530 of 2015, 531 of 2015, 532 of 2015, Police Station - Sungarhi, District - Pilibhit; whereby the accused appellants Devendra Shukla @ Mantu, Rahul Shukla Alias Rinku and Mahesh Shukla have been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302/149 IPC alongwith fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment to undergo three months additional imprisonment; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 323/149 IPC; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 148 IPC; sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment under Section 452 IPC alongwith fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment to undergo two months additional imprisonment; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 504 IPC; sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment under Section 506 IPC; sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 4/25 Arms Act alongwith fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment to undergo one month additional imprisonment. All the sentences are to run concurrently.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rinku Alias Rinkesh vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 25 April, 2025

2. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet no.120 of 2024 dated 08.05.2024, cognizance/summoning order dated 21.10.2024 and the entire proceedings of Special Session Trial No.1085 of 2024 (State vs. Rinku @ Rinkesh) arising out of Case Crime No.139 of 2024, under sections 354, 323, 504 I.P.C. and sections 7/8 of POCSO Act, P.S. Madhotanda, District- Pilibhit, pending in the court of learned Special Judge (POCSO Act), Pilibhit.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document
1   2 Next