Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Prem Chand And Anr. vs The State Of Haryana And Anr. on 24 May, 1971

Prem Chand vs State Of Haryana & Another on 30 September, 2013

CWP No. 2813 of 2006 (Prem Chand vs State of Haryana & another) "4. That the total coming under khasra No. 19//10/1 measuring 2K-15M i.e. 1663.75 sq. yards or 0.343 acres stands released by the Government and license under section -3 of Urban Area Act no. 8 of 1975 stands granted to the owner/petitioner by Directed (sic Director), Town & Country Planning, Haryana, Chandigarh vide license No. 570 of 2006 dated 24.03.2006.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document

Subash Chander vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 3 June, 1982

12. For similar, if not identical reasons, the reliance of the learned counsel for the petitioner on Prem Chand v. State of Haryana, AIR 1972 Punj & Har 50, is equally in vain. This again was a case of the exploitation of saltpetre and all the considerations aforementioned are applicable thereto. What is even more is the fact that the learned counsel for the parties therein had expressly rested themselves entirely on the entries in the wajib-ul-arz without laying any claim to lead any other evidence or to rebut the presumption raised by Section 42 therewith. The Division Bench expressly noticed that there was no disputed question of fact raised in those writ petitions and that in fact no such objection was pressed at the time of the arguments. Reference to para 23 of the report would indicate that the learned Advocate General on behalf of the respondent-State himself relied only on the entries in the wajib-ul-arz and produced the same before the Bench after seeking an adjournment. I am, therefore, clearly of the view that this case is entirely distinguishable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next