Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.16 seconds)
Documents citing Gopal Dass vs Bal Kishan Dass on 31 May, 2011

Smt. Bilqeesh Begum And 2 Others vs M/S Brij & Company Pvt. Ltd. on 7 January, 2019

Per contra, learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent submitted that benefit of exemption under Section 24 (2) could not be claimed by the petitioners as they did not comply with the requirements of the said provision, having failed to file application for allotment before the District Magistrate. He also placed reliance upon Section 2 (2) of the Act and the judgement in Gopal Dass to buttress his submission.
Allahabad High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M K Gupta - Full Document

Jagdish Chand Kashyap vs State Of U.P. And Another on 24 September, 2015

14. The aforesaid proposition of law was also not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. Rather, he himself cited the decision in the case of Gopal Dass (supra) in submitting that the new structure should have been constructed after complete demolition of the existing structure. In other words, it was urged that where the old structure was not completely demolished as in the instant case, it would be treated to be an old construction and would not be exempt from the provisions of the Act.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M K Gupta - Full Document
1