Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.99 seconds)
Documents citing Geb-Substituted As Gujarat State ... vs Harishkumar N on 17 January, 2013

Harshaben Dalpatsinh Rajput vs President on 21 February, 2017

8. Reliance is also placed on the decision of the learned single judge rendered in case of G.E.B. Substituted as Gujarat State Electricity Corporation vs. Harishkumar N.Bosamiya reported in 2014 (3) GLR 2277 wherein also the orders of appointment of respondent workman were demonstrative that his engagement was temporary and time to time, it was extended. Though repeatedly but on each occasion the appointment was for a fixed period. The last order was dated 17/18-8-1989, which was extended up to 31- 12-1989. The services of the workman was not retained after the expiry of the said period. In such circumstances, the court has held that the services were terminated at the end of specified period as in each order of appointment the contract of employment reflected that there was a stipulation about expiry of the contract. Therefore, when his service did not continue at the end of period specified in the last appointment Page 10 of 16 HC-NIC Page 10 of 16 Created On Sun Aug 13 21:06:22 IST 2017 C/SCA/10414/2007 JUDGMENT order, it did not constitute retrenchment within a meaning of Section 25 F of the I.D.Act and a case is covered under exception as contemplated in Section 2(oo)(bb) of the I.D.Act.
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S G Gokani - Full Document
1