Noted In State Of Madras vs . A. Vaidyanatha Iyer Air 1958 on 1 June, 2022
9. During the course of final arguments, Ld counsel for the
complainant submitted that the complainant has duly proved her
case by placing on record the entire documentary evidence along
with his ITR and documents showing ownership of agricultural
land. He submitted that the complainant has proved his financial
capacity in his testimony and by showing his ITR for the relevant
years. He also submitted that the accused has admitted his
signatures on the cheque in question and has also admitted that
the address mentioned on the legal notice is his correct address
and thus, presumption arises in favour of the complainant and
against the accused. He relied on the following judgements
● Naresh Chand Tyagi v Devender Kumar Tyagi 2022
SCC OnLine Del 526
● Bir Singh v Mukesh Kumar (2019) 4 SCC 197
● Ragini Gupta v Piyush Dutt Sharma 2019 SCC OnLine
MP 4372
● Lekhraj Sharma v Yashpal Gupta 2015 SCC OnLine Del
10074
He prayed that the accused be convicted.