Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Sawinder Singh And Anr. vs State Of Punjab on 9 November, 2005

Hakam Singh vs Punjab State Power Corpn . Ltd. And Ors on 21 November, 2018

Rule 9(a) of the Punjab State Electricity Board Services of Engineers (Electrical) Regulations, 1965, prescribed the qualifications and the number of posts which can be filled up by way of promotion to the post 2 of 4 ::: Downloaded on - 06-01-2019 20:42:50 ::: RSA-4223-2017 (O&M) 3 of Assistant Engineer. According to the said Rule, 10% of the cadre posts of Assistant Engineers had to be filled up by promotion on seniority-cum- merit from the technical subordinates Grade-I, which included Junior Specialists along with other categories having holding 3 or 4 years diploma in Electrical, Mechanical or Electronics/Tele-communication Engineering of a recognized institute with 10 years as technical subordinate Gr-II or Gr.I out of which a minimum of five years service should be in the capacity of technical subordinates Gr.I. It is an admitted position that the appellant-plaintiff possesses one year ITI course from the National Council for Training in Vocational Trades. He, therefore, does not possess or holding diploma in any of the esteem which is of the duration of 3 or 4 years. He being, therefore, not qualified for promotion to the post could not be entitled to the benefit of the pay scales. Further, as per the findings recorded by the Courts below, the appellant has not taken over the charge of the Shift Engineer nor has he relinquished the charge of Junior Specialist and on the date of his retirement, he has given charge of Junior Specialist. Nothing on the record indicates that the appellant would be entitled to the benefit of the pay scale of the post of Assistant Engineer especially in the light of the fact that he does not fulfil the requisite qualification for the post. Reliance of the Courts below on the judgments passed by this Court in Major Singh vs. State and others, 2009 (4) SCT 315 as also Sawinder Singh vs. State of Punjab, 1994 (4) SCT 157, cannot be said to be erroneous in any manner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A G Masih - Full Document

Gulzar Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab --Respondent on 26 August, 2011

Mr.A.S.Rai,DAG,Punjab Rakesh Kumar Jain,J:(Oral) This order shall dispose of two petitions bearing CRM-M- 21985 of 2011 titled as Gulzar Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab in which notice of motion was issued on 22.7.2011 and interim bail was granted and CRM-M-23390 of 2011 titled as Sawinder Singh and another Vs. State of Punjab in which notice of motion was issued on 4.8.2011 and interim bail was granted.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document
1