Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.32 seconds)

Lakhwinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 12 September, 2023

4. This is how, by way of present second petition, prayer has again been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. While referring to the report of the chemical examiner dated 05.02.2022, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per it the exact cause of death cannot be ascertained in this case, however, possibility of death due to cardiac arrest resulting from hypertensive heart disease and marked atherosclerosis cannot be ruled out. He thus, submits that at best the present may be a case falling under Section 302 Part-II IPC and not Section 302 IPC, against which the petitioner has already remained in custody for a period of more than 1 year and 7 months and extension of his custody was uncalled for. He also submits that the investigation having been concluded with the filing of challan followed by framing of charges and only 1 witness been examined out of the total 13 cited by the prosecution, trial was likely to take some time and no useful purpose was going to be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars. He further submits that in the present case, post examination of PW-1 namely Satvir Kaur (complainant), one additional accused namely Karamjit Singh @ Pamma has been summoned in exercise of powers under Section 319 Cr.P.C., by the trial Court who is yet to appear and thus, the trial is again going to take some time. Learned counsel for the petitioner also relies upon the order dated 11.04.2023 passed in CRM M-61040-2022 titled as Lakhwinder Singh and Another Vs. State of Punjab, to contend that in the same FIR, co-accused namely Sukhwinder Kaur i.e. wife of the petitioner has already been granted concession of regular bail.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amarjit Kaur @ Jiti vs State Of Punjab on 25 May, 2022

10. Though, during the course of arguments, learned counsel has also submitted that as per reply, the petitioner was found to be standing at the gate carrying the contraband in a transperent polythene bag and which again makes recovery suspect as has been held in CRM-M- 8026 of 2020 titled in Lakhwinder Singh @ Lakha Vs. State of 5 of 6 ::: Downloaded on - 27-05-2022 03:07:55 ::: CRM-M-24030-2021 (O&M) -6- Punjab as well as in CRM-M-20019 of 2020 titled as Gurwinder Singh @ Binder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, but this Court need not go into the said aspect inasmuch as it is a case where violation of Section 42 NDPS Act is apparently there. The petitioner is stated to be behind bars since the last about 1 year and 1 month. As on date only 2 out of the cited 13 PWs have been examined. In these circumstances, when it is rendered doubtful as to whether the petitioner had indeed committed the offence in question or as to whether she had been arrested legally, further detention of the petitioner would not be justified. The petition, as such, is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to her furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - G S Gill - Full Document

Varinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 18 November, 2025

The said order of summoning was set aside vide judgment dated 18.07.2024 passed in CRM- M-44097-2022 titled as 'Lakhi @ Lakhwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab. 5 The aforesaid judgment rendered by the learned Single Bench of this Court was assailed by the complainant before the Hon'ble Supreme Court 3 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 29-11-2025 04:35:32 ::: CRA-S-3422-2025 (O&M) -4- by way of Special Leave Petitions (Criminal) bearing Nos. 14822-14829 of 2024. Vide judgment dated 26.03.2025, the order dated 18.07.2024 passed by the Single Bench of this Court was set aside and the order of summoning passed by the trial Court was upheld.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next