Hardeep Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 1 November, 2021
He is residing at different address and at no stage summons were
served upon him. It has been further contended that no summon
was served upon the petitioner as the registered office of the
Company has been shifted from DLF Gateway Towers, DLF City
Phase III, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002 with effect from 9th
December, 2002 to 13 Adbul Fazal Road, New Delhi, 110001, with
effect from 9th August, 2007 to 111, Rectangal-1, Saket District
6
Centre, New Delhi and with effect from 8 th July, 2016 to Y-65,
Ground Floor, Hauz Khas, New Delhi - 110016 and corporate
office of the company has been shifted from October, 2007 from
11th Floor, DLF Gateway Towers, DLF Cyber City, Phase III,
Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002 to 14th Floor, Building No. 9A, DLF
Cyber City, Guraon-122002, as such, there was no information
about the present proceedings and the absence of the accused
was not deliberate but because of non-service of proper summon.
He would lastly submit that warrant of arrest issued against
accused No. 4 - Hardeep Singh and proceedings against the
Company for violation of Section 7(i) of the Act, 1954, which is
punishable under Section 16 (1)(a) of the Act, 1954 and Rules,
1955 may kindly be quashed. He placed reliance upon the
judgments of the Supreme Court & High Courts in the matters of
Shiv Kumar alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani v. State of
Maharashtra1, Girishbhai Dahyabhai Shah v. C.C. Jani and
another2, Ravindra Chopade v. State of Madhya Pradesh 3,
Marico Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Anr. 4, ITC Ltd. & others
v. The State of Madhya Pradesh5, Rameshwar Dayal v. State
of U.P.6, Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Ghisa Ram 7, M/s
Cargill India Private Limited v. State of Haryana and another 8,
Ahmed Dababhai Advani v. State of Maharashtra 9, M/s.
Gurulakshmi Food Products, Guntur vs. The State of A.P. 10,
Sri Shravan Kumar Agarwal v. The State of A.P. 11, M. Durga
Rao v. The State of A.P.12, D. Rama Moorthy v. Food
Inspector, Perambra Circle, Vadakara & another13, M/s
Hindustan Lever Limited & another v. The State of
Chhattisgarh14 and Sandeep Tiwari v. State of Chhattisgarh15
in support of their submissions.