citedby: 31824826

Rizwan vs State Of U.P. on 20 April, 2026

In view of the law laid down by the Hon?ble Apex Court in the case of Nanhe (supra), the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant that he had no intention to cause death of the appellant is not acceptable.

Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Varma - Full Document

Agys Ram Saran Verma vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 1 November, 2023

He further placed the judgment dated 05.07.2023 of this Court passed in Public Interest Litigation No. 390 of 2022 (Nanhe Lal Kanaujia vs. State of U.P.) in order to demonstrate that no right will accrue to anybody in respect to the public utility land as provided under Section 132 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act/under Section 77 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006.

Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Nanhe vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 29 November, 2024

5. The first bail application of applicant-Nanhe was rejected by this Court by a detailed order dated 26.07.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29339 of 2023 (Nanhe Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others). For ready reference, the order dated 26.07.2023 is reproduced hereinunder:-

Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Ramramaiya Das vs State Of U.P. on 28 July, 2025

So far as, contention with regard to lodgment of the applicant under Section 302 IPC is concerned, the Apex Court in the case (Nanhe versus the State of Uttar Pradesh), Criminal Appeal No. 2791 of 2023 decided on 21.11.2023 arising out of an incident resulting in accidental death held the appellant at the relevant time, being heavily intoxicated and not in a position even to know what he was doing, proceeded to dismiss the appeal, upholding the conviction of the appellant and the order of the High Court convicting the appellant for an offence under Section 302 IPC, observed as under:

Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arvind Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru.Secy.Revenue Lko. ... on 9 August, 2023

It is expected from the Tehsildar, Tehsil-Mankapur, District-Gonda that he shall consider the matter strictly in terms of principle settled by this Court in the judgment and order dated 03.08.2023 passed in Writ - C No.6430 of 2023 (Shatrohan vs. State of U.P. & 4 Others) and in the judgment and order dated 05.07.2023 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.390 of 2022 (Nanhe Lal Kanaujia vs. State of U.P. And 7 Others).

Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Jitendra Verma vs State Of U.P. on 23 November, 2023

Bail Application No.44488 of 2023 (Nanhe Lal Vs. State of UP). He, therefore, submitted that since the case of the applicant is on the better footing to that of the aforesaid co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail. There is no previous criminal history of the applicant. There is no likelihood of his abscondence or tampering with the evidence. The applicant is in jail since 07.08.2023. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 6 Others on 9 May, 2024

6. I am of the view that no such directions can be issued by this Court. However, it is provided that the petitioner will be at liberty to approach the concerned authority along with judgment in the case of Nanhe Lal Kanaujia (supra) for necessary compliance.

Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results