Virendra Kumar vs State Of U.P. on 30 May, 2022
15. Thus, the revision is partly allowed. The judgment and order dated 28.01.2004 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), District Sonbhadra, dismissing Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1998(Virendra Kumar Vs. State), preferred against the judgment and order dated 18.02.1998 passed by learned Special Judicial Magistrate, Duddhi, District Sonbhadra in Criminal Case No. 228 of 1987 (State Vs. Shyam Sundar Agrahari and another), under Section 7/16 of Food Adulteration Act, Police Station Shakti Nagar, District Sonbhadra, so far as it relates with the conviction of revisionist is maintained, but the sentence is modified. Instead of sending the revisionist, Virendra Kumar, to jail, he is given benefit of Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1938. He is directed to file two sureties bonds of Rs.20,000/- and a personal bond of same amount to the effect that he shall maintain peace and good behaviour and shall not commit any offence during the period of one year. The bonds aforesaid be filed by him within two months from the date of this judgment before District Probation Officer, Sonbhadra.