Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1289 (1.40 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Karnataka vs Satish on 13 March, 1996

Sh. Mukh Lal vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 21 April, 2014

The witnesses were not given any suggestion in the cross-examination that the accused was not driving the offending vehicle; that he was not driving the offending vehicle at a high speed or that he did not cause the accident with the deceased. Ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor for State has submitted Criminal Appeal No. 11/2014 Page 6 of 12 that the prosecution has discharged its burden to prove the case of the prosecution but the appellant/convict has not led any evidence despite opportunity and has failed to disprove that he was not driving the offending vehicle on the alleged date, time and place at a high speed and caused the accident. The authority reported as State of Karnataka v Satish 1999 [1] JCC [SC] 97 is distinguishable on the facts of this case. There is no illegality in the impugned judgment and order on sentence and therefore the appeal is liable to be dismissed.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gunasekaran vs The State on 2 June, 2025

The rulings cited by the learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant in (i) Crl.A.No.371 of 2010, dated 23.09.2015 in the case of C.Nagaraj vs. The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Inspector of Police, Watrap Police Station, Virudhunagar District; (ii) (1998) 8 SCC 493 in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Satish; (iii) MANU/TN/5243/2022 in the case of B.Karthik vs. State; (iv) Prabhakaran vs. State of Kerala in Appeal (Crl) No. 775 of 2005 dated 21.06.2007 and (v) Abdul Ansar vs. State of Kerala reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 775 are not applicable to this case and they are rejected.
Madras High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - S S Kumar - Full Document

State vs Naveen Kumar on 16 October, 2024

36. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment of "State of Karnataka vs. Satish" SCC (CRI) 1508 and the Hon'ble Delhi UMESH Digitally signed by UMESH KUMAR KUMAR Date: 2024.10.16 18:09:45 +0530 FIR No.284/2015 State Vs. Naveen Kumar 22 of 24 PS Lodhi Colony High Court in case titled "Abdul Subhan vs. State" 2007 (1) CCC (HC) 414 observed that in the absence of material facts and circumstances indicating that the accused driver acted in a rash or negligent manner, he cannot be held guilty of the offence.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next