Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 174 (6.38 seconds)
Documents citing Dharam Deo Yadav vs State Of U.P on 11 April, 2014

Simran Pal Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 8 January, 2015

Obligation cast upon him, in view of law laid down in Dharam Deo Yadav (supra) as also provisions of Section 106 of the Evidence Act stand not discharged; (iii) conduct of the accused; (iv) disclosure statement, made by the accused; (v) which led to recovery of dead body of the deceased; (vi) and the place from where he pushed her into the gorge. In our considered view, prosecution evidence is reliable and trustworthy. It is clear, cogent, convincing and consistent. There is no missing link or doubt about the chain of events, woven by credible evidence, pointing only towards the guilt of the accused and no other hypothesis of either his innocence or possibility of involvement of a third person. Each and every incriminating circumstance stands clearly established by the prosecution. Reliable and clinching evidence is on record to such effect. It cannot be said that view other than the one, which we have discussed and formed, even by inference, would emerge on record.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 86 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

(An Appeal Under Section 374 Of The Code ... vs State Of Odisha on 23 March, 2022

22. The above submissions have been considered. The Court will now proceed to discuss each of the links in the chain of circumstances, as projected by the prosecution. First is the link of 'last seen'. The decision in Dharam Deo Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh(supra) is instructive in this regard. The legal position was explained in the said decision in Para-19 as under:
Orissa High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R K Pattanaik - Full Document

Subash M. Varghese vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 6 April, 2011

exhumed was that of Ajas and also that the blood samples collected from the house where the accused were said to have resided at the time when the incident had taken place also belonged to Ajas. These facts speak for themselves and these are telling circumstances for which no explanation is offered by the accused persons. It was these circumstances which found favour with the trial court and there are no grounds made out to interfere with the finding of the court below. Learned Public Prosecutor placed considerable reliance on the decision reported in Dharam Deo Yadav v. State of U.P. ((2014) 5 SCC 509) and contended that the facts of this case resemble well with the facts of the above decision.
Kerala High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 42 - P Bhavadasan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next