Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (2.11 seconds)
Documents citing Jaypee Rewa Plant vs C.C.E. & S.T., Bhopal on 26 December, 2016

Mangalam Cement Ltd vs Udaipur on 10 April, 2023

(Credit-Rs. 2,40,877) All.) Works Contract Services in the nature of  Jaypee Rewa Plant v. CCE,2018 (9) TMI 633 - Erection, Commissioning and Installation CESTAT NEW DELHI Service for augmentation of existing track  Orient Cement Ltd. v. CCE, Hyderabad, 2017 capacity at railway siding of MGU for inward transport of inputs and outward (51) STR 459 (Tri.-Hyd.) clearance of goods.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Coms,C.Ex - Jsr vs Tata Steel Ltd on 18 December, 2019

14.4.1 In the case of ACC Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, 2018 (361) ELT 343 (Bom) the Hon'ble Bombay High Court has referred to and followed the decisions of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. Union of India, 2008 (228) ELT 517 and the Chattisgarh High Court in the case of Ambuja Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, 2010 (256) ELT 690, in which the Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal in Jaypee Rewa Plant Vs. Commissioner, 2003 (159) ELT 553 (T-LB) was held to be no longer good law and overruled.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The India Cements Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And ... on 3 April, 2023

)], The India Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (6) TMI 581 - CESTAT Chennai], M/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (1) TMI 822- CESTAT Mumbai], Jaypee Rewa Plant Vs. CCE [2018 (9) TMI 633- CESTAT New Delhi] are cited in respect of availability of credits on Railway track materials that had crystallised and settled the issues as judicial precedent are binding on subsequent decisions. We are in total agreement with his submissions, even though learned E/85078, 85159, 85160, 88159/2013 8 Authorised Representative reiterates the findings of the Commissioner we found no substance in his order to confirm the same in denying credits to the Appellant in respect of other inputs, admissible to the Appellant. Hence the order.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The India Cements Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And ... on 3 April, 2023

)], The India Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (6) TMI 581 - CESTAT Chennai], M/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (1) TMI 822- CESTAT Mumbai], Jaypee Rewa Plant Vs. CCE [2018 (9) TMI 633- CESTAT New Delhi] are cited in respect of availability of credits on Railway track materials that had crystallised and settled the issues as judicial precedent are binding on subsequent decisions. We are in total agreement with his submissions, even though learned E/85078, 85159, 85160, 88159/2013 8 Authorised Representative reiterates the findings of the Commissioner we found no substance in his order to confirm the same in denying credits to the Appellant in respect of other inputs, admissible to the Appellant. Hence the order.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The India Cements Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And ... on 3 April, 2023

)], The India Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (6) TMI 581 - CESTAT Chennai], M/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (1) TMI 822- CESTAT Mumbai], Jaypee Rewa Plant Vs. CCE [2018 (9) TMI 633- CESTAT New Delhi] are cited in respect of availability of credits on Railway track materials that had crystallised and settled the issues as judicial precedent are binding on subsequent decisions. We are in total agreement with his submissions, even though learned E/85078, 85159, 85160, 88159/2013 8 Authorised Representative reiterates the findings of the Commissioner we found no substance in his order to confirm the same in denying credits to the Appellant in respect of other inputs, admissible to the Appellant. Hence the order.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The India Cements Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And ... on 3 April, 2023

)], The India Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (6) TMI 581 - CESTAT Chennai], M/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Vs. CCE [2018 (1) TMI 822- CESTAT Mumbai], Jaypee Rewa Plant Vs. CCE [2018 (9) TMI 633- CESTAT New Delhi] are cited in respect of availability of credits on Railway track materials that had crystallised and settled the issues as judicial precedent are binding on subsequent decisions. We are in total agreement with his submissions, even though learned E/85078, 85159, 85160, 88159/2013 8 Authorised Representative reiterates the findings of the Commissioner we found no substance in his order to confirm the same in denying credits to the Appellant in respect of other inputs, admissible to the Appellant. Hence the order.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next