Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Brijendra Pratap Singh (Deceased By Lr) ... vs Smt. Prem Lata Singh And Ors. on 1 November, 2004

Naresh Soni And 3 Others vs Fourth Apar Civil Judge Junior Division ... on 4 June, 2025

In such circumstances, opposite party no.1 i.e. Fourth Apar Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gonda is directed to decide the pending application for injunction in Regular Suit No.1400 of 2020 (Rajendra Pratap Soni versus Smt. Bazbunnisha) expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date service report regarding service of notice upon defendant is brought on record of proceedings.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M Mathur - Full Document

P Mary Chitra vs P Domnick Rosario @ Dominick on 10 January, 2025

43. It is further contention of defendant No.2, very suit filed by plaintiffs is barred by law of limitation. It is argued on behalf of learned counsel for defendant No.2 that, Pappaiah and his sons have sold property in favour of T.N. Ananda Rao and Smt. Nagalakshmi. And 32 O.S.No.25367/2008 present suit filed after lapse of nearly 27 years from date of sale of suit item No.1 property in favour of T.N. Ananda Rao and Smt. Nagalakshmi. The learned counsel for plaintiffs has argued that, no period for limitation is fixed for filing suit for partition by co- owner. On this preposition of law, learned counsel for plaintiffs has relied upon decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1995 SC 1789 in case of Vidya Devi @ Vidyavathi dead by LR's Vs. Prem Prakash and Others, wherein it is held that, "no period of limitation is fixed for filing suit for partition by co- bhumidhar."
Bangalore District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1