Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (1.05 seconds)
Documents citing Ferro Concrete Construction (I) Pvt. ... vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ... on 3 October, 2001

Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd vs Employees Provident Fund Organisation ... on 25 September, 2019

On the other hand, even in Ferro Concrete Construction (supra) the High Court of Madhya Pradesh has held that before passing any orders under Section 8F(3) of the EPF Act are passed against a third party, it is obligatory for the Recovery Officer to hold an inquiry, after providing adequate opportunity to the alleged debtor before directing him to make any deposit. In the present case, the respondent no.1 has virtually acted on the unsubstantiated dictates of the respondent no.2 and has directed the petitioner to pay the amount even when it had specifically denied holding any amount of the respondent no.2, which action is not in consonance with the scheme of Section 8F(3) of the EPF Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 2 - R Palli - Full Document

M/S.Sri Ganapathi Mills vs The Regional Provident Fund ... on 25 November, 2008

5. The second contention is that before passing an order under Section 8(F) of the Act, an enquiry is to be held and only after affording opportunity to the employer, an order could be made under Section 8(F) of the Act. The learned counsel relies on a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Ferro Concrete Construction (I) Pvt. Ltd., vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner reported in 2002(1) LLJ 986. But, in the counter, it is stated that no such enquiry needs to be held. From the rival contentions raised, it is to be now analyzed as to whether enquiry needs to be held under Section 8(F) of the Act, before any order being passed by the authority. Section 8(F)(3) of the Act mandates that a notice in writing requires to be issued to the person, who holds the money belonging to the employer.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - S Nagamuthu - Full Document

Recovery Officer (Assistant Provident ... vs Municipal Council Dabra Thr on 2 May, 2017

4. Per Contra, learned counsel for the petitioner / respondent 3 WA.315/2016 herein relying upon the decisions of 2001 (4) SCC 362 (Mohan Wahi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Varanasi and Ors.), 2002 (93) FLR 883 (Ferro Concrete Construction (I) Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, 2013 LLR 7 (Bombay) ( Navnit Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India), 2013 LLR 1251(Madras) (T.I. Metal Forming Chennai Vs. R.P.F.C.)
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

M/S. Unity Security Force And Training ... vs The Assistant Provident Fund ... on 12 March, 2018

He has relied upon the decision of ::: Uploaded on - 17/03/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 18/03/2018 01:01:19 ::: 7JgWP 1303.16.odt 4/6 the Madhya Pradesh High Court in case of M/s Ferro Concrete Construction (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, M.P., Indore and ors. Reported in 2002 LAB. I.C. 412 for the proposition that the provision of Section 8-F(3)
Bombay High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - R K Deshpande - Full Document

Employees Provident Fund Organization vs Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya on 17 March, 2022

1 2017 (4) MPLJ 219 On the other hand Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that adopting coercive method huge amount of Rs.1,37,43,353/- & Rs.60,28,875/- have been recovered from the respondent No.1, which is an educational institution and that is the reason learned Single Judge has quashed the orders 18.01.2022 and 19.01.2022. He relied on Ferro Concrete Construction (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Indore and others 3; Vijaya Bank vs. EPFO and others 4; Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisation and another 5 and OPTO Circuit India Limited vs. Axis Bank and others 6.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1