Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.41 seconds)

Mahesh Chand Bareth vs The State Of Rajasthan on 8 July, 2024

2. This batch of 47 appeals involves common questions of law. They arise from the judgments of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur. The main appeal, namely, Civil Appeal 7906 of 2010 (Mahesh Chand Bareth & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) (hereinafter referred to as ‘Mahesh Chand Bareth’) arises out of a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No. 402 of 2009 dated 21.05.2010. The other matters arise out of the same batch as Mahesh Chand Bareth or out of the judgments relying on Mahesh Chand Bareth or based on the judgments which, in turn, relied on Mahesh Chand Bareth. By virtue of the said judgments, the appellants were denied relief. The appellants challenged the 3 selection of candidates to the post of “Prabodhak” (teacher) by virtue of advertisement issued on 31.05.2008. Recruitment and other service conditions for the post of Prabodhak are governed by the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules’).
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S Kant - Full Document

Bibek Paria & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 16 July, 2025

14. However, Mr. Mitra has submitted that all other criterion including prior experience are valid and required for selection of talented 2 AIR 1974 SC 1232 3 (1995) 6 SCC 16 9 candidates and in this regard reliance is placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ram Sharan Maurya v. State of U.P.4 and Mahesh Chand Bareth & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.5 (paragraphs 28,29,34 and 46).
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Sen - Full Document

Bibek Paria & Ors vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 16 July, 2025

14. However, Mr. Mitra has submitted that all other criterion including prior experience are valid and required for selection of talented 2 AIR 1974 SC 1232 3 (1995) 6 SCC 16 9 candidates and in this regard reliance is placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ram Sharan Maurya v. State of U.P.4 and Mahesh Chand Bareth & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.5 (paragraphs 28,29,34 and 46).
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Sen - Full Document

Sdas vs (Dismissed) on 4 February, 2026

12. The decision relied upon by Mr. Bandopadhyay of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in (2024) 8 SCC 124 (Mahesh Chand Bareth & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) has held in no uncertain terms that parameters of qualifying marks not being in the public domain cannot be a ground for disrupting the entire process of appointment. The parameters set forth by the concerned authority has been followed uniformly without any discrepancy between any of the participating candidates. The petitioner had participated in the process and no prejudice has been caused to him, even it is assumed that the parameters of qualifying marks in second round were not in public domain.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sdas vs (Dismissed) on 18 February, 2026

12. The decision relied upon by Mr. Bandopadhyay of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in (2024) 8 SCC 124 (Mahesh Chand Bareth & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) has held in no uncertain terms that parameters of qualifying marks not being in the public domain cannot be a ground for disrupting the entire process of appointment. The parameters set forth by the concerned authority has been followed uniformly without any discrepancy between any of the participating candidates. The petitioner had participated in the process and no prejudice has been caused to him, even Page |6 it is assumed that the parameters of qualifying marks in second round were not in public domain.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Chand Jain vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 August, 2023

1. Learned counsel for the respondents informs this Court that a similar matter being registered as Civil Appeal No. 7906 of 2010, titled ‘Mahesh Chand Bareth and Signature Not Verified Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.’, was listed before an Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2023.08.10 16:55:14 IST Reason: another Bench as recently as on 26 th July, 2023, and it is 1 C.A. NO. 8215/2013 requested that this appeal may also be tagged with the said matter.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1