citedby: 720312

Harkesh Hooda vs . Dalpat Singh & Ors. on 23 December, 2011

Reference may also be made to the cases of D.T.T.D.C vs. D.R. Mehra & Sons, 62 (1996) DLT 234 (DB), Sant Lal Jain vs. Avtar Singh, A.I.R. 1985 SC 857, Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs. A Vismam, 1996(2) R.R.R. 353, and G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62.

Delhi District Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shail Sinha vs . Ministry Of Communications & Anr. on 29 October, 2011

In the case of G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, it was laid down that after expiry of licence, the licencee is not entitled to any injunction against the true owner. Grant of such injunction would amount to perpetuating his unlawful possession.

Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

By This Order vs A Vismam on 5 March, 2014

In this regard, reliance is placed on the decisions of Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vs. A Vismam, 1996(2) R.R.R. 353, D.T.T.D.C vs. D.R. Mehra & Sons, 62 (1996) DLT 234 (DB), Sant Lal Jain vs. Avtar Singh, A.I.R. 1985 SC 857, G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, Thomas Cook Limited Vs. Hotel Imperial & Ors., 127 (2006) DLT 431 and Rame Gowda Vs. M. Varadappa Naidu, I (2004) SLT 675.

Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Master Lawrence Barnabas vs . Jalal Masih on 6 April, 2011

In the case of G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, it was laid down that after expiry of licence, the licencee is not entitled to any injunction against the true owner. Grant of such injunction would amount to perpetuating his unlawful possession.

Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bijender Singh vs . Sangeeta & Ors. on 8 April, 2011

In the case of G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, it was laid down that after expiry of licence, the licencee is not entitled to any injunction against the true owner. Grant of such injunction would amount to perpetuating his unlawful possession.

Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Ashish Jain vs Sh. Radhey Shyam & Anr on 15 December, 2014

In support of his contentions, the Ld. Counsel for defendant has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI) 1996 IAD (Delhi) 1042.

Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kamal Chand Sharma vs Muni Devi & Anr on 15 March, 2011

In the case of G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, it was laid down that after expiry of licence, the licencee is not entitled to any injunction against the true owner. Grant of such injunction would amount to perpetuating his unlawful possession.

Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Kumari vs . Tej Ram And Others on 15 March, 2011

In the case of G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, it was laid down that after expiry of licence, the licencee is not entitled to any injunction against the true owner. Grant of such injunction would amount to perpetuating his unlawful possession.

Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Santosh Kumar vs Sh. Ashok Datta S/O Sh. Kali Charan on 23 July, 2013

In the case of G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, it was laid down that after expiry of licence, the licencee is not entitled to any injunction against the true owner. Grant of such injunction would amount to perpetuating his unlawful possession.

Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Deepak Sahay vs . All India Federation Of The Deaf on 19 March, 2011

In the case of G.N. Mehra Vs. International Airports Authority of India (IAAI), 63 (1996) DLT 62, it was laid down that after expiry of licence, the licencee is not entitled to any injunction against the true owner. Grant of such injunction would amount to perpetuating his unlawful possession.

Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results