Pawan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 August, 2019
After registration of the aforesaid crime, with oblique
motive and afterthought, the petitioners have also lodged a report
against the respondents no.3 and 4, for which the Department
has not given any sanction for prosecution nor they took any
instruction from Superintendent or any senior authority. The
petitioners, thereafter, applied for sanction, but as sanction was
not granted, therefore, they have approached before this Court by
filing W.P. No.5941/2015. The said writ petition was withdrawn
with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on 13/02/2017. During
pendency of this writ petition, the respondents have filed their
reply and along with their reply they have filed copy of the order
dated 28/09/2015 by which the respondent no.1 has refused to
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE
Writ Appeal No.955/2019
(Pawan Rathore and Another Vs. State of M. P. and Others)
-3-
grant sanction for prosecuting the respondents no.3 and 4. The
petitioner, therefore, filed the present petition challenging the
impugned order dated 28/09/2015.