citedby: 76983226

1 - 2 of 2 (0.57 seconds)

Relying upon the said judgment the Division Bench of this Court at Gwalior in Dr.(Mrs.) Rukmani Tiwari vs. State of M.P. and another, Writ Appeal No.108/2016 decided on 15.07.2019, Dr. R.K. Sude vs. State of M.P. and another, W.A. No.997/2018 decided 17.02.2020 as well as the Division Bench of this Court at Bench at Indore in R.K. Sharma vs. State of M.P. and another, W.A. No.1857/2020 decided on 29.11.2019 and Dr.Sushant Kumar vs. State of M.P. and another, W.A. No.802/2020 decided on 01.09.2020 h a s held similarly situated teachers entitled to be superannuated at the age of 65 years. It is not in dispute that the appellant is a similarly situated employee.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Relying upon the said judgment, the Division Bench of this Court in Dr.(Mrs.) Rukmani Tiwari vs. State of M.P. and another [Writ Appeal No.108/2016 decided on 15.07.2019], Dr. R.K. Sude Vs. State of M.P. and another [W.A. No.997/2018 decided 17.02.2020] as well as the Division Bench of this Court at Bench at Indore in R.K. Sharma vs. State of M.P. and another [W.A. No.1857/2020 decided on 29.11.2019 and Dr. Sushant Kumar Vs. State of M.P. and another [W.A. No.802/2020 decided on 01.09.2020] has held similarly situated teachers entitled to be superannuated at the age of 65 years. It is not in dispute that the appellant is a similarly situated employee.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document

Search Results Page