Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (3.80 seconds)
Documents citing Mrs. Amrita Wife Of Shri Rattan Kumar vs Union Of India & Others) on 11 October, 2013

Poonam vs D/O Post on 27 March, 2026

20. The issue is no longer res integra. The case of the applicant is squarely covered by Amrita Vs. Union of India & Others (Supra), wherein in similar circumstances it has been held that in the absence of proved negligence, recovery cannot be effected from an employee merely on the basis of alleged contributory negligence. The attempt of the respondents to distinguish the said judgment is not convincing, as in the present case also the charge of negligence remains unsubstantiated by reliable evidence.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Amarjeet Singh Chawla And Anr vs Union Of India And Anr on 7 July, 2022

NOT 406 MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AJIT KUMAR-6553042 01.11.2017 TO APPLICABLE AFFAIRS AND ANR. 31.10.2022 7613/2019-MONICA SANJEEV MONICA SANJEEV NOT 407 AGGARWAL AND ANR. VS. UNION AGGARWAL 01.11.2017 TO APPLICABLE OF INDIA AND ANR. -2647724 31.10.2022 7613/2019-MONICA SANJEEV SHOBHA BANSAL - NOT AGGARWAL AND ANR. VS. UNION 01.11.2017 TO 2652089 APPLICABLE OF INDIA AND ANR. 31.10.2022 7614/2019-AMRITA KUAMR AND AMRITA KUMAR - NOT 408 ANR. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND 01.11.2017 TO 1931485 APPLICABLE ANR. 31.10.2022 7614/2019-AMRITA KUAMR AND RAJENDER KUMAR - NOT ANR. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND 01.11.2017 TO 1932043 APPLICABLE ANR. 31.10.2022 7626/2019-MANDEEP MANDEEP NOT 409 MANCHANDA AND ANR. MANCHANDA 01.11.2017 TO APPLICABLE VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. -1374379 31.10.2022 7626/2019-MANDEEP RAKESH MANCHANDA - NOT MANCHANDA AND ANR. 01.11.2017 TO 2479958 APPLICABLE VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 31.10.2022 7634/2019-AMAR KANU LAL VS. AMAR KANU LAL- 01.11.2017 TO NOT 410 UNION OF INDIA & ANR 6442801 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE 7692/2019-RAKESH ASTHANA AND RAKESH ASTHANA - NOT 411 ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA AND 01.11.2017 TO 676987 APPLICABLE ANR. 31.10.2022 7692/2019-RAKESH ASTHANA AND SUMITA ASTHANA - NOT ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA AND 01.11.2017 TO 1857307 APPLICABLE ANR. 31.10.2022 7702/2019-HARIPRAKASH 01.11.2017 TO NOT 412 HARIPRAKASH-8261255 VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE 7715/2019-RAHUL KAPUR 01.11.2017 TO NOT 413 RAHUL KAPUR-772764 VS. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE 7750/2019-SIDDHARTH JAGDISH SIDDHARTH JAGDISH- NOT 414 AND ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & 01.11.2017 TO 3144783 APPLICABLE ANR 31.10.2022 7750/2019-SIDDHARTH JAGDISH VIKAS AGARWAL- 01.11.2017 TO NOT AND ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA 6394046 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT SINGH RAWAT Page 268 of 327 Signing Date:11.07.2022 13:53:43 &ANR 7753/2019-NARAYAN GUPTA VS. NARAYAN GUPTA- 01.11.2017 TO NOT 415 UNION OF INDIA & ANR 6781849 31.10.2022 APPLICABLE ARUN GUPTA 7758/2019-ARUN GUPTA & ANR VS. NOT 416 01.11.2017 TO UNION OF INDIA & ANR APPLICABLE
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 370 - Cited by 40 - Manmohan - Full Document

Abhishek Kumar vs Garrison Engineer on 28 July, 2023

Even in CWP No. 2083/2007 titled Rattan Kumar and Others Vs. Union of India and Others, vide order dated 19.06.2018 (Annexure A-3), the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed this Tribunal's order and held that till the Government of India takes a decision, the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of RLA at the same rates as given to the similarly situated employees posted at Shimla. This judgement was implemented by the respondents but only qua the petitioners therein.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1