Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (1.50 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Durga Devi Gupta vs State Of Chhattisgarh 2 Fa/325/2018 ... on 5 March, 2019

Krishna Kant Alias Krishna Kant Mishra vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 6 October, 2025

16. Consequently, the impugned judgment and order dated 21st August, 2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.2 in Criminal Misc. Case No. 20 of 2011 (Smt. Manorama Devi & 2 Others Vs. Kishnakant), under Section 127 Cr.P.C. Police Station-Dhoomanganj, District Prayagraj is modified to the extent that now the revisionist shall pay Rs. 3,000/- per month in fovour of opposite party no.2 (wife) in place of Rs.2,000/- per month towards maintenance allowance from the date of filing of application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. Rs. 1,500/- per month each to opposite party nos. 3 and 4 from the date of filing of application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. till the date of attaining their age of majority. Now the revisionist shall also pay Rs. 6,000/- per month to opposite party no.2 from the date of passing of the impugned judgment. Since the revisionist has no regular source of income, it would be too harsh for him to pay arrears of maintenance allowance as directed above in one stroke. This Court therefore, provides that the same shall be paid by the revisionist in 24 monthly equal installments. The first installment shall commence from 10th October, 2025.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar vs Sub-Registrar-Ix (S-W) on 7 September, 2022

22. Therefore, it appears that the law is that under section 25, it is for the Registrar to decide whether there was any urgent necessity or unavoidable accident which led to the delay and it is not for the civil court in a suit under section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, to sit in appeal over the decision of the Registrar in the discretionary matter.2 Under Section 77 of the Registration Act, 1908, the Court is only to see whether the document executed is genuine and has been validly executed by the parties. Even otherwise, I find that the Registrar has, vide order of refusal dated 2 Reference can also be had to Sanjiva Row's Registration Act, 10 th edition, 2002, p. 805 wherein also the author has relied on the following authorities i.e. Durga Singh v. Mathura Das, I.L.R. 6 All.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Krishna Devi vs District And Sessions Court, Gurugram ... on 15 April, 2024

Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 13.02.2024 passed by the District & Sessions Judge, Gurugram, whereby the Civil Suit No. 2529 of 2023 titled as 'Smt. Krishna Devi Vs. Wg. Cdr. Ratnesh Gupta' preferred by the petitioner has been transferred from the Court of Sh. Anil Kumar Yadav, Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Gurugram to the Court of Sh. Harsh Kumar Singh, Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) Gurugram.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next