Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (6.29 seconds)

Mamidi Rama Kiran vs State Of Ap on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chiranjeevi Satya Varma vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J Lovaraju vs The State Of Ap on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D.Anjaneyulu At Dongara Anjaneyulu At ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Y.Ramanjaneyulu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vardhanapu Sombabu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sk. Khajavali, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P.V. Prasanth Kumar, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

J N V Satyanarayana vs State Of Ap on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.Sridhar, vs The Inspector General Of Police, on 30 April, 2025

However, as discussed above, the Honie Guards are holders of Civil post by applying the principles laid down in "State of Assam V. Kana.k Chandra Dutta 99 and "Satyaxnr Singh v. Union of Indict (referred supra) as there is no explanation in the A.P.Home Guards Act as contained in U.P.Home Guards Act. For removal of Home Guard, necessary procedure prescribed under rules and Act is to be adhered to strictly.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 79 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next