Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)

Apparao Yadavrao Akat (Died) Thr Lrs ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 24 February, 2021

In the case of Babasaheb s/o Apparao Akat and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others (supra), the Division Bench of this Court has held that if election of APMC could not be held because of Assembly Election, the appointment of Administrator straightway is not justified in absence of any allegation of mal-administration or mis- feasance committed by members of the Committee. The Division Bench observed that the approach of the appropriate authority in issuing the orders of appointment of Administrator cannot be sustained in view of section 14 (3) and 15-A of the Act of 1963.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 18 - R G Avachat - Full Document

Krusnak Education Society, Arvi ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Department Of ... on 27 September, 2018

In the case of Agricultural Produce Market committee, Arvi and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 1988 Mh.L.J. 228, it is held by the Division Bench of this Court at Nagpur that section 15A of the Act of 1963 is not violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India. The provision is mandatory. The hearing is not necessary.

Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare, Director, ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The ... on 9 March, 2017

In case of Bhagwan Sampatrao Ghodmare and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2017 (4) Mh.L.J. 394, it is held by the Division Bench of this Court at Nagpur that power of State Government under section 14(3A) is overriding in nature as it operates notwithstanding anything contained in Act of 1963. While postponing the election of the Committee, grounds must be found to be sufficient by the State to postpone election in public interest. The State Government is required to demonstrate grounds while issuing the order of postponement of election of APMCs.
1