Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.28 seconds)
Sunil @ Sunil Kumar vs Lok Sewak Auto Mobiles Pvt Ltd & Anr on 16 January, 2019 cites

Anuj Chopra And Ors. vs Vaneeta Khanna And Ors. on 25 May, 2016

13. The question is no longer res integra and has been the subject matter of numerous judgments. Reference in this regard may be made to Som Dev Vs. Rati Ram (2006) 10 SCC 788, Arun Kumar Tandon Vs. Akash Telecom Pvt. Ltd. ILR (2010) 2 Del 727, Anuj Chopra Vs. Vaneeta Khanna 2016 SCC OnLine Del 3356, Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.S. Vohra (2016) 228 DLT 49 (DB), Abbot India Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra (2014) 208 DLT 201, ASV Industry Vs. Sunder Mohan 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3176, Jiwan Das Vs. Narain Das AIR 1981 Delhi 291, Sanjiv Pathak Vs. Som Nath (2013) 204 DLT 667 and Sunil Kapoor Vs. Himmat Singh (2010) 167 DLT 806. It has been held, that a mere Agreement to Sell does not create any rights in the property subject thereof, not till a decree for specific performance and conveyance in pursuance thereto is executed. In view of the said judgments, the need to elaborate further is not felt.
Delhi High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Sanjiv Pathak vs Som Nath & Ors on 6 August, 2013

13. The question is no longer res integra and has been the subject matter of numerous judgments. Reference in this regard may be made to Som Dev Vs. Rati Ram (2006) 10 SCC 788, Arun Kumar Tandon Vs. Akash Telecom Pvt. Ltd. ILR (2010) 2 Del 727, Anuj Chopra Vs. Vaneeta Khanna 2016 SCC OnLine Del 3356, Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.S. Vohra (2016) 228 DLT 49 (DB), Abbot India Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra (2014) 208 DLT 201, ASV Industry Vs. Sunder Mohan 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3176, Jiwan Das Vs. Narain Das AIR 1981 Delhi 291, Sanjiv Pathak Vs. Som Nath (2013) 204 DLT 667 and Sunil Kapoor Vs. Himmat Singh (2010) 167 DLT 806. It has been held, that a mere Agreement to Sell does not create any rights in the property subject thereof, not till a decree for specific performance and conveyance in pursuance thereto is executed. In view of the said judgments, the need to elaborate further is not felt.
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 7 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Som Dev & Ors vs Rati Ram & Anr on 6 September, 2006

13. The question is no longer res integra and has been the subject matter of numerous judgments. Reference in this regard may be made to Som Dev Vs. Rati Ram (2006) 10 SCC 788, Arun Kumar Tandon Vs. Akash Telecom Pvt. Ltd. ILR (2010) 2 Del 727, Anuj Chopra Vs. Vaneeta Khanna 2016 SCC OnLine Del 3356, Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.S. Vohra (2016) 228 DLT 49 (DB), Abbot India Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra (2014) 208 DLT 201, ASV Industry Vs. Sunder Mohan 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3176, Jiwan Das Vs. Narain Das AIR 1981 Delhi 291, Sanjiv Pathak Vs. Som Nath (2013) 204 DLT 667 and Sunil Kapoor Vs. Himmat Singh (2010) 167 DLT 806. It has been held, that a mere Agreement to Sell does not create any rights in the property subject thereof, not till a decree for specific performance and conveyance in pursuance thereto is executed. In view of the said judgments, the need to elaborate further is not felt.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 84 - P K Balasubramanyan - Full Document

M/S Asv Industry & Anr vs Surinder Mohan & Anr on 19 August, 2013

13. The question is no longer res integra and has been the subject matter of numerous judgments. Reference in this regard may be made to Som Dev Vs. Rati Ram (2006) 10 SCC 788, Arun Kumar Tandon Vs. Akash Telecom Pvt. Ltd. ILR (2010) 2 Del 727, Anuj Chopra Vs. Vaneeta Khanna 2016 SCC OnLine Del 3356, Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.S. Vohra (2016) 228 DLT 49 (DB), Abbot India Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra (2014) 208 DLT 201, ASV Industry Vs. Sunder Mohan 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3176, Jiwan Das Vs. Narain Das AIR 1981 Delhi 291, Sanjiv Pathak Vs. Som Nath (2013) 204 DLT 667 and Sunil Kapoor Vs. Himmat Singh (2010) 167 DLT 806. It has been held, that a mere Agreement to Sell does not create any rights in the property subject thereof, not till a decree for specific performance and conveyance in pursuance thereto is executed. In view of the said judgments, the need to elaborate further is not felt.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

M/S. Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs J.S. Vohra on 12 May, 2016

13. The question is no longer res integra and has been the subject matter of numerous judgments. Reference in this regard may be made to Som Dev Vs. Rati Ram (2006) 10 SCC 788, Arun Kumar Tandon Vs. Akash Telecom Pvt. Ltd. ILR (2010) 2 Del 727, Anuj Chopra Vs. Vaneeta Khanna 2016 SCC OnLine Del 3356, Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.S. Vohra (2016) 228 DLT 49 (DB), Abbot India Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra (2014) 208 DLT 201, ASV Industry Vs. Sunder Mohan 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3176, Jiwan Das Vs. Narain Das AIR 1981 Delhi 291, Sanjiv Pathak Vs. Som Nath (2013) 204 DLT 667 and Sunil Kapoor Vs. Himmat Singh (2010) 167 DLT 806. It has been held, that a mere Agreement to Sell does not create any rights in the property subject thereof, not till a decree for specific performance and conveyance in pursuance thereto is executed. In view of the said judgments, the need to elaborate further is not felt.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Abbot India Ltd. vs Rajinder Mohindra on 8 August, 2014

13. The question is no longer res integra and has been the subject matter of numerous judgments. Reference in this regard may be made to Som Dev Vs. Rati Ram (2006) 10 SCC 788, Arun Kumar Tandon Vs. Akash Telecom Pvt. Ltd. ILR (2010) 2 Del 727, Anuj Chopra Vs. Vaneeta Khanna 2016 SCC OnLine Del 3356, Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. J.S. Vohra (2016) 228 DLT 49 (DB), Abbot India Ltd. Vs. Rajinder Mohindra (2014) 208 DLT 201, ASV Industry Vs. Sunder Mohan 2013 SCC OnLine Del 3176, Jiwan Das Vs. Narain Das AIR 1981 Delhi 291, Sanjiv Pathak Vs. Som Nath (2013) 204 DLT 667 and Sunil Kapoor Vs. Himmat Singh (2010) 167 DLT 806. It has been held, that a mere Agreement to Sell does not create any rights in the property subject thereof, not till a decree for specific performance and conveyance in pursuance thereto is executed. In view of the said judgments, the need to elaborate further is not felt.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 Next