Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.33 seconds)Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd. vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade Marks, ... on 16 November, 2006
16. The appellant's contention that evidence was filed even before the order was passed cannot be accepted. On this argument he relied on the observations of this Board made in OA/12/2005/TM/AMD Sanya Electric Co. Ltd v. Sanyo Ceratiles Pvt. Ltd. "The Assistant Registrar had in fact granted time to the appellant to file their evidence and had communicated to the appellant after the due date. On perusal of the records we find that the appellant had also filed their evidence in support of opposition which was received by the Trade Marks Registry, the second respondent herein, but not considered by the Assistant Registrar on the date of passing of the order."
Asian Paints Limited vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade Marks ... on 10 February, 2005
8. The appellant relied on various judgments in support of his contention that the Registrar should have considered his evidence on record before passing an order, namely (1) Asian Paints Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks 2005 (30) PTC 444 (IPAB) (2) Hindustan Lever Limited v. Sunrider Corporation 2006 (32) PTC 287 (IPAB) (3) 2007 PTC 1 Wyeth Holdings v. Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (4) Sanya Electric Co. Ltd v. Sanyo Ceratiles Pvt. Ltd. O.A.12/2005/TM/AMD and Kailash v. Nankhu .
Champakbhai Parsottambhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 11 January, 2001
12. Learned Counsel for the second respondent relied on the judgment reported in (1) Videocon Narmada Electronics Ltd. v. Navbharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. 2005 (0) GLHEL 215835 (2) Champakbhai Parsottambhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Ors. (3) Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. (4) Ramachandra v. Govind in support of his contention.
Kailash vs Nanhku & Ors on 6 April, 2005
12. Learned Counsel for the second respondent relied on the judgment reported in (1) Videocon Narmada Electronics Ltd. v. Navbharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. 2005 (0) GLHEL 215835 (2) Champakbhai Parsottambhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Ors. (3) Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. (4) Ramachandra v. Govind in support of his contention.
R. Ramachandra Raja vs M. Nanda Govind on 16 April, 2005
12. Learned Counsel for the second respondent relied on the judgment reported in (1) Videocon Narmada Electronics Ltd. v. Navbharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. 2005 (0) GLHEL 215835 (2) Champakbhai Parsottambhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Ors. (3) Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. (4) Ramachandra v. Govind in support of his contention.
The Trade Marks Act, 1999
Videcon Narmada Electronics Ltd. And ... vs Navbharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. And Anr. on 7 September, 2005
12. Learned Counsel for the second respondent relied on the judgment reported in (1) Videocon Narmada Electronics Ltd. v. Navbharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. 2005 (0) GLHEL 215835 (2) Champakbhai Parsottambhai Patel v. State of Gujarat and Ors. (3) Kailash v. Nanhku and Ors. (4) Ramachandra v. Govind in support of his contention.
Section 130 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
1