Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.98 seconds)Section 41 in The Punjab Courts Act, 1918 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 52 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Triloki Nath Singh vs Anirudh Singh (D) Thr. Lrs . on 6 May, 2020
In support of his contentions, learned counsel
placed reliance upon the judgments of the Supreme Court of India in Triloki
Nath Singh Vs. Anirudh Nath Singh 2020(2) RCR(Civil) 661, Suhrid
Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh and others 2010 AIR (Supreme
Court) 2807, M/s Sree Surya Developers and Promoters Vs. N. Sailesh
Prasad and others 2022(2) Civil Court Cases 226(S.C.), Alagammal and
others Vs. Ganesan and another 2024(1) Civil Court Cases 654(S.C.)
Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs Randhir Singh & Ors on 29 March, 2010
In support of his contentions, learned counsel
placed reliance upon the judgments of the Supreme Court of India in Triloki
Nath Singh Vs. Anirudh Nath Singh 2020(2) RCR(Civil) 661, Suhrid
Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh and others 2010 AIR (Supreme
Court) 2807, M/s Sree Surya Developers and Promoters Vs. N. Sailesh
Prasad and others 2022(2) Civil Court Cases 226(S.C.), Alagammal and
others Vs. Ganesan and another 2024(1) Civil Court Cases 654(S.C.)
M/S. Sree Surya Developers And ... vs N. Sailesh Prasad on 9 February, 2022
In support of his contentions, learned counsel
placed reliance upon the judgments of the Supreme Court of India in Triloki
Nath Singh Vs. Anirudh Nath Singh 2020(2) RCR(Civil) 661, Suhrid
Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh and others 2010 AIR (Supreme
Court) 2807, M/s Sree Surya Developers and Promoters Vs. N. Sailesh
Prasad and others 2022(2) Civil Court Cases 226(S.C.), Alagammal and
others Vs. Ganesan and another 2024(1) Civil Court Cases 654(S.C.)
Guruswamy Nadar vs P.Lakshmi Ammal(D) Through Lrs. & Ors on 1 May, 2008
and
Gursuwamy Nadar Vs. P. Lakshmi Ammal (D) through LRs and others
2008(3) RCR (Civil) 173 and judgment Karnataka High Court in Smt.
Sushila and others Vs. Vijaykumar and others 2020(6) KantLJ 113,
judgment of Jammu and Kashmir High Court in Gulam Nabi Khanday and
others Vs. Mushtaq Ahmad and others 2024 AIR Jammu and Kashmir 92,
judgment of Orissa High Cout in Radjashyam Routray Vs. Puranjan
Mohapatra and others 1987 AIR(Orissa) 142, judgment of Allahabad High
Court in Amarnath and others Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation,
Kanpur and another 1985 AIR(Allahabad) 163 and judgment of this Court
in Smt. Sarvjeet Kaur Vs. Rang Lal, 1999 (1) Civil Court Cases 0310.,
Chand Kaur vs Raj Kaur (Died) And Others on 1 August, 1996
In support of his contentions, learned counsel reliance upon
the judgments in Chand Kaur Vs. Raj Kaur 1997 AIR (Punjab and
Haryana) 155, Shakuntla Devi Vs. Kamla and others 2005(2) RCR(Civil)
668, E. Ramu Vs. E. Krishnan 2010(55) RCR(civil) 38, Dillip Gupta and
another Vs. Debashish Palit and others 2006(1) RCR(Civil) 649,
Vaddeboyina Tulasamma and others Vs. Vaddeboyina Sesha Reddi (dead)
by LRs 1977 AIR(Supreme Court) 1944 and Santhanam Kachapalaya
Gurukkal Vs. V. Subramanya Gurukkal 1977 AIR (Supreme Court) 2024.
Baldev Raj vs Dinesh Kumar & Anr on 19 August, 2009
In Parkash Kaur (since deceased) Vs. Lakha Singh and others
(CR-337 of 2023 decided on 19.01.2024), a Coordinate Bench of this Court,
while referring to a judgment of this Court in the case of Baldev Raj Vs.
Dinesh Kumar and another 2009(4) RCR(Civil) 603, stated that the
principle of lis pendens would apply if the proceedings were not collusive.
Still further, it is settled law that the principle of lis pendens does not annul
the transfer but renders it subservient to the rights of the parties to a
litigation.