Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 144 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Mrs. Jamuna Uke vs State Of Chhattisgarh 121 ... on 3 November, 2017
24. Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Vijay Kumar vs. Harsh
Lata Aggarwal in CM (M) ENo.539/2008 decided on 10.09.2008 observed
that when Income of both husband and wife are almost similar and both
almost equally qualified, there is no justification to grant interim
maintenance to the wife.
Jagwati vs Gajender Kumar on 1 September, 2016
26. Similarly, in the case of Rupali Gupta vs. Rajat Gupta, (2016) 234
DLT 693, it was observed by this Court that a very qualified spouse having
the earning capacity but desirous of remaining idle, cannot set up a claim for
interim maintenance.
Damanpreet Kaur vs Indermeet Juneja & Anr. on 14 May, 2012
Similar observations have been made in the cases of
Damanpreet Kaur vs. Indermeet Juneja, Crl.
Manmohan vs Shri Bhagwan Sheorinarayan Math Mandir ... on 30 November, 2018
Rev. P. 344/2011; K. N. vs.
R.G., MAT. APP (F.C.)
Gurpreet Dhariwal vs Amit Jain on 16 March, 2022
25. Similarly, in the case of Gurpreet Dhariwal vs. Amit Jain, MAT.
APP. (F.C.) 311/2019, it was observed by Division Bench of this Court that
a lady having capacity to work cannot be allowed to sit idle and be burden
on her husband for demanding maintenance and litigation expenses. It was
concluded that the appellant can very well earn and support herself and
declined to grant any maintenance.
Mamta Sharma vs Rajesh Chandra Sharma on 7 February, 2019
93/2018 and Mamta vs. Rajesh, (2000) 3 MP LJ
1