Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.27 seconds)Bedanga Talukdar vs Saifudaullah Khan & Ors on 28 September, 2011
It is well-settled
principle of law that every selection process has to be complied strictly in terms
of criteria mentioned in Advertisement as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the case of "Bedanga Talukdar Vs. Saifudaullah Khan and Others" reported in
(2011) 12 SCC 85 which reads as under:
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Anil Tanti Son Of Sri Pali Tanti Village ... vs The State Of Jharkhand on 14 May, 2018
In Anil Tanti Case the rejection of
candidature was of late submission of caste certificate. In this case as petitioner
in Annexure-5 of the writ petition has admitted that caste certificate was issued
by the Circle Officer, in terms of Clause-8(i) and 8(iii) of the Advertisement, the
condition of the advertisement has not been complied by the petitioner. Thus the
8
judgment rerlied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner is distinguishable in
the facts and circumstances of the present case and accordingly, on the basis of
that judgment, no relief can be extended to the petitioner.
Raj Kumar Mahto & Others vs The State Of Jharkhand & Others on 4 March, 2020
8. Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-
Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission has relied on judgment of the Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court in the case of "Raj Kumar Mahto & Others Vs. State of
Jharkhand & Others" reported in 2020 (1) JBCJ 465 (H.C) particularly paras
34 & 36 which are quoted here-in-below:
Rohan Thakur vs The State Of Jharkhand & Others on 16 January, 2019
9. Learned counsel for the respondent-Jharkhand Staff Selection
Commission further relied on judgment in the case of "Rohan Thakur Vs. State
of Jharkhand & Ors" reported in 2019(3) JBCJ 44 (HC) particularly para 6
which is quoted here-in-below:-
1