Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (2.59 seconds)
Emcure Healthcare Limited & Anr vs Drugs Controller General Of India & Anr on 22 January, 2020 cites

Unison Pharamaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India And Anr. on 8 January, 2019

29. I therefore find no merit in WP (C) 10114/2018, titled IPCA Pharmaceuticals Limited & Anr vs. Union of India & Anr; WP (C) 10919/2018, titled Lupin Limited and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr.; WP (C) 11067/2018, titled Mankind Pharma Limited vs. Union of India & Anr.; and WP (C) 11392/2018, titled M/s Wings Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr. and the same are accordingly dismissed. The pending applications shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost.
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 6 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs M/S. Cipla Ltd. & Anr on 21 October, 2016

19. As held by this Court in Unison Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (Supra) as also by the Supreme Court in Union of India and Others vs. Cipla Limited and Another, (2017) 5 SCC 262, this Court cannot sit in appeal over the opinion of experts and therefore, once it is found that the Expert Committee has kept all relevant considerations in mind, this Court, in exercise of its powers of judicial review, will not seek to substitute the opinion of such experts.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 66 - M B Lokur - Full Document

Union Of India vs Pfizer Limited on 15 December, 2017

46. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the Impugned Notification, insofar as it is stated to be applicable to the FDC of S (+) Etodolac + Paracetamol, cannot be sustained. The same is set aside. The matter is remanded back to DTAB/Sub-Committee constituted by it to examine the issue regarding the said FDC in accordance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court in Pfizer Limited and Others (Supra). The DTAB/Sub-Committee shall submit its report to the Central Government who may act thereon in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 17 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Wockhardt Limited And Anr vs Union Of India And Anr. on 7 January, 2019

43. As held by this Court in Wockhardt Limited and Anr. (Supra), this Court can interfere with the Impugned Notification where it finds the same to have been issued by excluding relevant consideration or without giving any reasons on the submissions made by the manufacturers. The present case would fall within this limited exception. It was for the DTAB/Sub-Committee to have considered and given reasons whether there is no difference between FDC of S (+) Etodolac + Paracetamol and FDC of Etodolac + Paracetamol. This Court cannot, in exercise of its power of Writ Jurisdiction, examine this aspect as it is no expert on the same.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 5 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Ipca Laboratories Ltd And Anr vs Union Of India And Anr on 17 June, 2019

29. I therefore find no merit in WP (C) 10114/2018, titled IPCA Pharmaceuticals Limited & Anr vs. Union of India & Anr; WP (C) 10919/2018, titled Lupin Limited and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr.; WP (C) 11067/2018, titled Mankind Pharma Limited vs. Union of India & Anr.; and WP (C) 11392/2018, titled M/s Wings Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr. and the same are accordingly dismissed. The pending applications shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to cost.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - P D Naik - Full Document
1   2 Next