Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.85 seconds)Section 12A in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Advocates Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
M/S. Ananda Social And Educational ... vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax on 19 February, 2020
In terms of the aforesaid observations respectfully following the
judgment in the case of Ananda (supra), in absence of any contrary decision,
fact, or submission by the revenue, we are of the considered view that the
rejection of the request of registration u/s 12AB of the Act in the present case
was unjustified, uncalled for, and against the settled principle of law.
Fifth Generation Education Society vs Commissioner Income-Tax on 10 May, 1990
In the matters of Commissioner of Income Tax vs Vijay Vargiya
Vani Charitable Trust1 and Fifth Generation Education vs Commissioner
Income Tax2, it is held that at the stage of Section 12A, the Commissioner is
not to examine the application of income. All that he may examine is whether
the application is made in accordance with the requirements of Section 12A
read with Rule 17A and whether Form No.10A has been properly filled up. He
may also see whether the objects of the trust are charitable or not. At this
Stage, it is not proper to examine the application of income.
Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) vs Somani Charitable Trust on 15 October, 2020
In the matters of Commissioner of Income Tax vs Vijay Vargiya
Vani Charitable Trust1 and Fifth Generation Education vs Commissioner
Income Tax2, it is held that at the stage of Section 12A, the Commissioner is
not to examine the application of income. All that he may examine is whether
the application is made in accordance with the requirements of Section 12A
read with Rule 17A and whether Form No.10A has been properly filled up. He
may also see whether the objects of the trust are charitable or not. At this
Stage, it is not proper to examine the application of income.
M/S. Educational Society Of St. Annes ... vs Ccit, Dehradun on 12 April, 2019
Ground No. 3: That the Ld. CIT erred in law and facts by applying the ratio of
the Supreme Court decision in New Noble Educational Society v. CCIT [2022]
143 taxmann.com 276 as the genuineness of the appellant is not under dispute
being a Central Government owned/controlled University exempt under
section 10(23C).
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Chhattisgarh Urology Society on 18 October, 2019
CIT v Chhattisgarh Urology Society in TAXC No.159 of 2017
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Rishabh Foundation Trust on 13 August, 2019
CIT v Rishabh Foundation Trust in TAXC No.166 of 2017