Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)S.S. Rathore vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 6 September, 1989
12. The Hon'ble Apex Court particularly in the
case of 8.S. Rathore v. State of Madhya Pradesh
reported in 1990 scC (L&S) 50 has observed that
unsuccessive representations cannot extend the period
of limitation. Para 20 and 21 of the said judgments is
reproduced herein under i -
Union Of India & Ors vs A. Durairaj (Dead) on 1 December, 2010
sase of Union of India & Ors. v. A. Durairaj
Tho ODIARGPIOPR occ
or two from the date of cause of action, the employer will
be a great disadvantage of effectively contest or counter
the claim, as the officers utho dealt with the matter
and/or the relevant records relating to the matter may no
longer be available. Therefore, even Uf no period of
limitation is prescribed, any belated challenge would be
Hable to be dismissed on the groiind of delay and laches. -
Ramesh Chand Sharma Etc vs Udham Singh Kamal And Ors on 12 October, 1999
Harish Uppal vs. UOr 1994
(2) SLI 177, i. Chandra Kumar vs, UOl 1897 (2) SER {SC}
' i, AIR 19S Sc 564 Pattaram vs. Union of India, 1996
wt
a
ial
'se
ae OA/489/2018
Lint 1127 (SC) UOI vs. Bhagnoar Singh, (199) 8 SCC 304
Ramesh Chand Sharma vs, Udhan Singh Kamal & Ors., 2002
(5) SLR (SC) 307 B. Parmasivan & Ors vs. UOI & Ors AT
Act, 1985.
Article 58 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Bank Of India & Anr vs Raj Kumar on 8 February, 2010
i?. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in State Bank of
India v. Raj Kumar, (2010) 11 8CC 661, elucidating the
nature of the scheme of compassionate appointments
ab
tf
erved: "Tt is now well settled that appointment on
compassionate grounds is not a source of recruitment.
Kanhaiya Lal Son Of Gaya Prasad And Ors. vs State Of U.P. on 19 January, 1994
In another decision in the case of Jagdish
wee cette tteee etre tte eet cere cerned siti deg eee ceeasteged Ts Wevereeeees : : tos GA/489/2018
Prasad v. State of Bihar (1996) 1 SCC 301 the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has observed as under:-
Ram Chandra Samanta vs The Union Of India And Others on 2 July, 2013
Fe. The respondents have also placed reliance on
several judgments like, P.S. Sadasivawaswamy Vs. 8/68 f
Tamil Nadu AIR 1974 SC 2271, Jacab Abraham ¥ Others
AT. Full Bench Judgments 1994-96, Ram Chandra Samanta
vs. UOI 1994 (26) ATC 228, $.S. Rathore vs. S/o M.P.
i983 (2) ATC 5321, Bhoop Singh vs. UOI IR 1992 sc 1414,
Secretary to Got. Of India ve. Shivaram M. Gaikwad
(1995) 30 ATC 635, Ex. Capt.
Uoi (Last In Motion List) vs Darshan Singh (High Up In The List) on 10 January, 2018
Harish Uppal vs. UOr 1994
(2) SLI 177, i. Chandra Kumar vs, UOl 1897 (2) SER {SC}
' i, AIR 19S Sc 564 Pattaram vs. Union of India, 1996
wt
a
ial
'se
ae OA/489/2018
Lint 1127 (SC) UOI vs. Bhagnoar Singh, (199) 8 SCC 304
Ramesh Chand Sharma vs, Udhan Singh Kamal & Ors., 2002
(5) SLR (SC) 307 B. Parmasivan & Ors vs. UOI & Ors AT
Act, 1985.
1