Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.26 seconds)
Aftab Ahamad And Another vs State Of U P And 3 Others on 4 March, 2020 cites

S/S Gaya Deen Kailash Chand vs State Of U.P. & Others on 6 March, 2013

It is contended by Sri J.L. Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are entitled for benefit of the service rendered by them while working on the post of Supervisor Tractor Custom Scheme and Incharge Sales Centre before calculating the final pension of the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners relied upon a judgement of co-ordinate Bench of this Court passed in Writ A No.46080 of 2012 (Gaya Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others).
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 6 - P Krishna - Full Document

Kanta Prasad Kannaujia vs State Of U.P.& 2 Ors. on 18 September, 2014

It is further contended that against the order passed by the Division Bench in the case of Kanta Prasad Kannaujiya (supra), the State Government filed Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 29583/2018 (State of U.P. and others Vs. Kanta Prasad Kannaujiya) which was dismissed by the Supreme Court vide its order dated 03.01.2019. It is further contended by Sri J.L. Patel learned counsel for the petitioners that in the case of Gaya Kumar Katihar, an order dated 01.05.2019 was passed by the State Government to pay the pension and other service benefits to him after calculating the service rendered by him as a Tubewell operator in Mandaliya Vikas Nigam, Allahabad. In this view of the matter, a prayer is made by the learned counsel for the petitioners to issue a writ for grant of pension and other benefits to the petitioners.
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Kanta Prasad Kannaujiya on 3 January, 2019

It is further contended that against the order passed by the Division Bench in the case of Kanta Prasad Kannaujiya (supra), the State Government filed Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 29583/2018 (State of U.P. and others Vs. Kanta Prasad Kannaujiya) which was dismissed by the Supreme Court vide its order dated 03.01.2019. It is further contended by Sri J.L. Patel learned counsel for the petitioners that in the case of Gaya Kumar Katihar, an order dated 01.05.2019 was passed by the State Government to pay the pension and other service benefits to him after calculating the service rendered by him as a Tubewell operator in Mandaliya Vikas Nigam, Allahabad. In this view of the matter, a prayer is made by the learned counsel for the petitioners to issue a writ for grant of pension and other benefits to the petitioners.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1