Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)Section 38 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Satheedevi vs Prasanna & Anr on 7 May, 2010
14. The Hon'ble Supreme Court Satheedevi Vs.
Prasanna and Another supra, while examining the
merits of the direction by the civil Court calling upon the
plaintiff therein to pay court fee on the market value of
subject property therein - a rubber plantation land - and
12
which direction was also affirmed by the Kerala High
Court, after considering the decisions by different High
Courts on the significance of the expression "value of
subject matter of the suit" as found in similar enactments
applicable to the respective states, has declared that such
valuation would be the 'value for which the document is
executed'. However, the case on hand before this Court
could be distinguished insofar as the applicability of the
enunciation by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
aforesaid decision inasmuch as the significance of a
separate mode for valuation in cases of lands which are
assessed to annual revenue as provided under Section 7
of the KCF & SV Act was not a subject matter for decision
by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Section 28 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 36 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
1