Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.27 seconds)Section 81 in The Delhi Land Reforms Rules, 1954 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
Section 185 in The Delhi Land Reforms Rules, 1954 [Entire Act]
Mohinder Singh (D) Thr. Lrs . vs Narain Singh . on 14 March, 2023
2. The petitioner contends that, by virtue of the judgment
of the Supreme Court in Mohinder Singh (deceased)
through LRs & Anr. v. Narain Singh & Ors. [(2023) 19
SCC 535], proceedings under the DLR Act stand
rendered non-est upon the urbanisation of the village in
question.
Rajiv Bal vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 24 November, 2022
2. Learned counsel for the parties are at ad idem that the issue involved is
similar to the one dealt with by this Court in W.P.(C) 10109/2024 titled Rajiv
Bal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr and connected matters.
Ajay Sinhal vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 18 May, 2023
3. In the present case, the proceedings were admittedly
initiated prior to the issuance of the aforesaid
notification of urbanisation. The Revenue Authority
passed an order in favour of the petitioner on
27.02.1987, which was challenged in appeal before the
respondent No. 1 in 1997. The appellate proceedings
remained pending at the time the urbanisation
notification was issued. The question that arises is
whether such proceedings can continue despite the
village in question being urbanised, including at the
appellate stage. This issue is currently pending
consideration before the Full Bench in Original
Reference No. 01/2024. The Full Bench is also
examining two Division Bench judgments of this Court,
in Ajay Singhal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. [LPA
169/2022 and connected matters; decided on
25.04.2023] and Subnam Gupta (Sabnam Gupta) v.
Union of India & Ors. [LPA 295/2024; decided on
15.04.2024], which appear to be at variance with each
other on this question.
Shabnam Gupta vs Union Of India And Ors on 22 September, 2017
"a. Whether the law as expounded in Sanvik Engineers by
the learned Single Judge and the proposition of law in
LPA 295/2024 titled Subnam Gupta (Sabnam
Gupta) vs. Union of India & Ors laid down by the
learned Division Bench is the correct proposition of
law?
Blue Bird Properties Pvt Ltd Now ... vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 29 July, 2021
b. Whether there is a divergence between the ratio of the
judgements in Blue Bird Properties Pvt Ltd (Now
Blue Bird Properties LLP) vs. Government of NCT
of Delhi & Ors. and judgement dated 25.04.2023 in
LPA 188/2022 and Subnam Gupta Sabnam Gupta
dated 15.04.2024 in LPA 295/2024 ? if so, which
judgement lays down the correct law?
Umed Singh vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 6 May, 2021
e. Though not arising from the above, however, many
such cases are being regularly filed under the provisions
of EPH Act, 1948 in similar circumstances, whether the
judgement of the Supreme Court in Mohinder Singh
laying down the law that post notification u/s 507(a) of
DMC Act 1957, the provisions of DLR Act, 1954 cease
to apply and the proceedings pending thereunder would
be non est in law would also apply in a similar fashion
to proceedings pending under EPH Act, 1948 since
definition of the word "land" appears to have
commonality between the two enactments? if so, to
what effect?(regard may be had to the judgement dated
01.11.1997 passed the learned division bench of this
Court in C.W. No. 2253 of 1997 captioned as Umed
Singh vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.
reported in (1997) 69 DLT 957 (DB)."