Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.25 seconds)C. Jayachandran vs State Of Kerala on 4 March, 2020
In similar case of Swati Sharma vs. Directorate
Education, GNCTD & Ors. [OA No.3896/2023] D.B. of this
Tribunal vide order dated 19.09.2025 based on law laid down
by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sunil & Ors., Vs. High
Court of Delhi (supra), Apoorva Pathak (supra) and C.
Jayachandaran (supra) allowed the OA directing the
respondents to grant benefits of seniority, annual increments
and other consequential benefits including the arrears of salary
w.e.f. 13.09.2019 i.e. the date when counterparts/juniors of the
applicant were issued appointment letters by the respondents.
Sunil Verma And Ors vs High Court Of Judicature Anr on 21 February, 2012
In similar case of Swati Sharma vs. Directorate
Education, GNCTD & Ors. [OA No.3896/2023] D.B. of this
Tribunal vide order dated 19.09.2025 based on law laid down
by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sunil & Ors., Vs. High
Court of Delhi (supra), Apoorva Pathak (supra) and C.
Jayachandaran (supra) allowed the OA directing the
respondents to grant benefits of seniority, annual increments
and other consequential benefits including the arrears of salary
w.e.f. 13.09.2019 i.e. the date when counterparts/juniors of the
applicant were issued appointment letters by the respondents.
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Ishwar Singh Khatri And Ors. on 4 August, 1989
"2. The respondent was granted notional appointment
and seniority as TGT with effect from 1984 on the
basis of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union
of India v. Ishwar Singh Khatri & Ors. 1993 (2)
SCALE 730. The petitioners, however, sought to deny
notional pay fixation to the respondent, on the ground
that the Supreme Court had only talked about
assigning proper seniority but had not granted the
relief of notional pay fixation. This led to the filing of
the aforesaid Original Application by the respondent.
As aforesaid, the Original Application of the
respondent has been allowed by the Learned
Tribunal.
Ishfaq Ahmad Khan vs Ut Of J&K on 6 October, 2021
23. So far as the submissions of learned counsel for the
respondents on delay and laches are concerned, it is not
disputed by Mr. Shashwat Sharma, learned counsel for the
respondents that the applicant participated in the same
selection process and she was excluded for no fault of her own.
The delay and latches were on the part of the respondents and
the applicant cannot be made to suffer due to delay and latches
on the part of respondents. We do not find any force in the
contentions of the respondents as similar contention has been
rejected in identical issue and similar facts by Hon'ble High
Court of J & K in case of Dr. Afaq Ahmad Khan (supra).
Ref: Case No. 25/2010, 41/2010, ... vs .£33 U?" £~':S5=..Ig1"M'1E':Nt 0'? ... on 16 February, 2012
19. We have passed order dated 02.03.2023 in OA
No.3247/2019 (supra) and already extracted hereinabove,
directing the respondents to consider claim of the applicant for
consequential benefits. The Courts orders are to be observed in
its observance rather than its breach, but it is unfortunate that
the litigatious spirit-of-respondents and the instrumentalities of
the Union have not been minimized even to the slightest extent
and applicant has been made to suffer for no fault of her own.
Shri Jai Karan Singh Chauhan Bal Kishan ... vs Delhi Develpment Authority & Ors Union ... on 14 February, 2019
In case of Anil Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors. [OA
No.1292/2024 (Delhi) decided on 30.01.2024] and Surender
Pal & Ors. Vs Govt. of Delhi & Ors., [OA No.2358/2019
decided on 10.07.2025]. The Division Bench [Principal Bench of
this Tribunal] vide orders dated 30.01.2025 and 10.07.2025
held that applicants are entitled for financial upgradations
under MACP Scheme by counting their service on notional
basis.
Signature Not Verified Digitally ... vs In Item Nos. 35, 36, 37, 38, 64, 66, 70, 91, ... on 14 September, 2022
24. The issue involved in the present OA is also covered by the
Order dated 15.05.2025 passed in the case of Ms. Priyanka
Rawat (supra) and in case of Swati Sharma (supra) decided on
19.09.2025, and these cases are no different than the case in
our hands.
Pilla Sitaram Patrudu & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 March, 1996
8. Pilla Sitaram Patrudu & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.,
reported in (1996) 8 SCC 637, Hon'ble Supreme Court was
seisin with similar issue that once the appellant is found
to be eligible according to the rules and appointment,
delay for no fault of him, then his seniority to be fixed
as per ranking in the select list. Their Lordships held
as under -
Kusheshwar Prasad Singh vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 19 March, 2007
In the case of Kushewar Prasad Singh Vs. State of
Bihar & Ors. (2007) 11 SCC 447 held as under:-