Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)

Mridul Dhar(Minor)&Anr vs Uoi&Ors on 12 January, 2005

We see no substance in this submission. Merely by making application pursuant to a pubic advertisement, no right of taking examination or to admission accrued to any of the applicants. We are also of the opinion that the decision to give entrance test and consequent public advertisement did not constitute estoppel against the IGIMS. The IGIMS was not estopped from revising its earlier decision and to join the bandwagon under the Act of 1995. Having regard to the importance of the admission to the MBBS course according to the time frame specified by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the matter of Mridul Dhar (minor) & Another (supra), we consider it expedient that the IGIMS is not restrained 8 Patna High Court LPA No.1207 of 2011 (2) dt.26-08-2011 8/8 from admitting students from the merit list prepared by the Board pursuant to the combined entrance competitive examination for 2011-12 held by the Board.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 464 - Full Document
1