Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 69 (0.74 seconds)

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 7 April, 2005

60. The present case in the perspective of the legal pronouncements referred to above is manifest with circumstantial evidence and according to the Enforcement Directorate the chain is complete thereby foisting the role of the petitioner in the acquisition and possession of 8.86 acres of land at Shanti Nagar, Baragain, Bariatu, Ranchi. It is pertinent to note that in the numerous registers and revenue records recovered from the premises of Bhanu Pratap Prasad the name of the petitioner or his family members does not figure. The plan of a Banquet Hall retrieved from the mobile of Binod Singh in his WhatsApp chat with the petitioner depicts Page 51 of 55 B.A. No. 4892 of 2024 the area as Lalu Khatal, and since the 8.86 acres of land allegedly possessed by the petitioner is in the vicinity of Lalu Khatal and since there was no other open tract of land of considerable dimension in the said area it was inferred that the plan of the Banquet Hall was prepared at the behest of the petitioner being oblivious to the fact that even the clients name did not figure in the plan submitted by Grid Consultants.
Supreme Court of India Cites 48 - Cited by 340 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next