Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.29 seconds)Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017
17. Towards compensation for loss of estate, the
Tribunal has awarded only an amount of Rs.5,000/-. As
per the decision in Pranay Sethi (supra), the petitioners
are entitled for an amount of Rs.15,000/- under the said
head and therefore, they are granted an enhanced
amount of Rs.10,000/- (15,000-5,000).
MACA Nos.1582/2015, 3151/2014 ..28..
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Puttamma W/O Lt Ramadas vs K L Narayana Reddy S/O Lt Lakshmaiah ... on 10 March, 2010
In Puttamma and Others v. K. L. Narayana
Reddy and Another (2013 KHC 4997 : (2013) 15 SCC
45 : 2014 (1) KHC SN 6 : 2013 (15) SCALE 437 : 2014
(1) KLT 738 : AIR 2014 SC 706 : 2014 (1) KLJ 777 :
Sreekumar vs The Divisional Manager, The National ... on 22 March, 2022
10. The question as to whether the person who has
been awarded compensation in excess of what has been
claimed can prefer an appeal under Section 173 of the
Act has been considered by the Division Bench of this
Court in Sreekumar v. Divisional Manger, National
MACA Nos.1582/2015, 3151/2014 ..11..
Insurance Company Ltd., Kollam [2022 (3) KHC 467],
wherein it was held that, once it is found that the
compensation to which claimant is entitled, be it under
any particular head or aggregate, is more than what is
claimed, its denial after assessment would result in
denial of just compensation. Sri. T.K. Koshy, the learned
counsel for the petitioners took me through paragraphs
77 and 78 of the said decision which read as under:
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur And Ors. on 30 June, 2020
In
Satinder Kaur (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
held that, when compensation is awarded under the
head loss of consortium, there is no justification in
awarding compensation for loss of love and affection as
a separate head. Therefore, Rs.1,00,000/- awarded by
the Tribunal under the head loss of love and affection
has to be deducted from the total compensation.
Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
K.R.Madhusudan & Ors vs Administrative Officer & Anr on 18 February, 2011
In K. R. Madhusudhan v. Administrative
Officer, (2011) 4 SCC 689 this Court held as
follows: (SCC p. 692, paras 14-15)
"14. In the appeal which was filed by the
appellants before the High Court, the
MACA Nos.1582/2015, 3151/2014 ..22..
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
The multiplier to be applied is the multiplier in terms of
the decision in Sarla Verma (supra).