Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.20 seconds)
Vaibhavi Pinkesh Solanki vs Pinkesh Vijaykumar Solanki on 12 February, 2021 cites

Sonal Shreyansh Vasa The Daughter Of ... vs Shreyansh Hitenbhai on 12 July, 2013

In the case of Sonal Shreyansh Vasa v. Shreyansh Hitenbhai Vasa (supra), this court has held that the Applicant wife therein has to travel the distance of 400 kms. to attend every hearing of the Court at Bhuj and being a lady she would have to be accompanied by her father, or any other male member of the family. Not only would this involve considerable inconvenience and hardships, it would also prove to be expensive in the long run and therefore, the applicant wife would face greater inconvenience in travelling from Vadodara to Kachchh on every date of hearing with her father. The educational qualifications and salary of the applicant would hardly have any nexus to the Page 6 of 8 Downloaded on : Wed Jan 12 08:39:58 IST 2022 C/MCA/1050/2019 JUDGMENT inconvenience and hardship faced by her in travelling from Vadodara to Bhuj accompanied by her father. Convenience of the wife must be looked into and therefore allowed the application and transferred the proceedings from Bhuj - Kachchh to Family Court Vadodara.
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 91 - A Kumari - Full Document

G.R Buvaneshwari vs G.S Puttaraju on 16 December, 2014

In the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of G.R.Bhuvneshwari v. G.S.Puttaraju (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has set aside the order of the High Court and the matter was transferred from the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Maddur to the Family Court at Mysore. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed in the judgment that the Appellant wife is employed as a teacher and is a Page 4 of 8 Downloaded on : Wed Jan 12 08:39:58 IST 2022 C/MCA/1050/2019 JUDGMENT single mother responsible for looking after her 9 year old son who is studying at a school at Mysore.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1   2 Next